Thank you Bruce and Shelley!
I just wanted to thank Matt, Bruce and everyone involved with
IFEFFIT/Artemis/Athena... it has been a Godsend.... I couldn't have
stumbled on it at a better time (I'm frantically trying to analyze about
4 beamtimes worth of SEXAFS data for papers and my thesis and WINXAS
wasn't really working out for me)!!!!!
Does anyone have any suggestions for additional literature in regards to
better understanding the quality of fits and the parameters involved?....
or perhaps know when we might be able to expect a updated version of the
Artemis literature? (What is currently there has helped me sooo much
that I've been checking for an update every couple of weeks hoping to get
see sections 2.2-3.2..... )
Also.... I guess I've realized that only knowing IFEFFIT with Artemis I
kinda take things for granted (like I didn't know that IFEFFIT was having
problems, in certain cases since I had only been checking the "Results"
and the error messages on the bottom of the window....) which meant I
missed errors like this in the IFEFFIT (since I didn't notice anything
unusual in the "Results"):
............
# Do the fit!
## fitting difference of Cov_0_06ML_bl1435_111703.chi and one or more paths ...
## === data set #1 of 1
feffit(1-8, group=data0_fit, chi=data0.chi, k=data0.k,
kweight=2.00, rmin=1, rmax=4, kmin=2.5, kmax=15, dk=2,
kwindow=kaiser-bessel, fit_space=R, do_bkg=no,
data_set=1, data_total=1)
feffit fitting 1 data sets
fitting ...
fitting ...
fitting ...
fitting ...
fitting ...
fitting ...
fitting ...
fitting ...
no uncertainties estimated!
fit gave a warning message:
too many fit iterations. try again with better
guesses or a simpler problem.
...............................................
I guess my question is.... is there anything else I should be looking for
in the IFEFFIT printout that I might not otherwise notice by just using
Artemis and looking at the error messages and "Results"?
Thanks for the input!
Sincerely,
Kristine Witkowski
Northwestern University