- Ifeffit - millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov

Re: [Ifeffit] lanthanides convergence
by joshua jason kas 03 Sep '08

03 Sep '08

Hi Eugenio, I have a question for you, When you say that convergence is not reached, do you mean convergence of the absoption spectrum or convergence of the LDOS? These are very different since the absorption has core-hole and self-energy broadening included. I noticed that you use 0.1 eV broadening for the LDOS, which is much smaller than the core hole broadening which is 4.16eV. Also, the calculation will be much quicker if you do not run LDOS since FEFF does the matrix inversion for each unique potential and energy when the LDOS card is present. Otherwise, the inversion is only done for the central atom potential at each energy. Cheers, Josh Kas > > Bruce, > > thanks for your answer, it is a great problem to increase the number of > atoms, huge CPU time is needed to finish a calculation. > > Here I pasted the header and the first lines of the atom list and attached > the whole file, if somebody could help me to reduce the calculation time I > will be grateful. > > Thanks in advance, euG > > * This feff8 input file was generated by Artemis 0.8.011 > * Atoms written by and copyright (c) Bruce Ravel, 1998-2001 > > TITLE name: ZnO:Er 1 at no distortion d= 4.136 > TITLE formula: ZnO > TITLE sites: Zn1,O1 > TITLE refer1: wyckoff, vol 1, ch III, p 111 > TITLE refer2: > TITLE schoen: > TITLE notes1: > > * Er L3 edge energy = 8358.0 eV > EDGE L3 > S02 1.0 > > * pot xsph fms paths genfmt ff2chi > CONTROL 1 1 1 1 1 1 > PRINT 3 0 0 0 0 0 > > *** ixc=0 means to use Hedin-Lundqvist > * ixc [ Vr Vi ] > EXCHANGE 0 > > *** Radius of small cluster for > *** self-consistency calculation > *** A sphere including 2 shells is > *** a good choice > *** l_scf = 0 for a solid, 1 for a molecule > * r_scf [ l_scf n_scf ca ] > SCF 4.0 > > *** Upper limit of XANES calculation. > *** This *must* be uncommented to > *** make Feff calculate full multiple > *** scattering rather than a path expansion > * kmax [ delta_k delta_e ] > XANES 4.0 > > *** Radius of cluster for Full Multiple > *** Scattering calculation > *** l_fms = 0 for a solid, 1 for a molecule > * r_fms l_fms > FMS 5.00 0 > > *** Energy grid over which to calculate > *** DOS functions > * emin emax eimag > LDOS -30 20 0.1 > > *** for EXAFS: RMAX 12.0 and uncomment > *** the EXAFS card > RPATH 0.1 > *EXAFS 20 > > POTENTIALS > * ipot Z element l_scmt l_fms stoichiometry > 0 68 Er 3 3 0.001 > 1 30 Zn 2 2 2 > 2 8 O 1 1 2 > 3 68 Er 3 3 2 > > ATOMS * this list contains 902 atoms > * x y z ipot tag distance > 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0 Er 0.00000 0 > -0.93804 -1.62473 -0.49466 1 Zn1 1.94019 1 > 1.87611 0.00002 -0.49466 1 Zn1 1.94023 2 > -0.93804 1.62477 -0.49466 1 Zn1 1.94023 3 > -0.93804 -1.62473 1.30173 2 O1 2.28346 4 > 0.93804 1.62473 -1.30173 2 O1 2.28346 5 > 1.87611 0.00002 1.30173 2 O1 2.28348 6 > -0.93804 1.62477 1.30173 2 O1 2.28348 7 > -1.87611 -0.00002 -1.30173 2 O1 2.28348 8 > 0.93804 -1.62477 -1.30173 2 O1 2.28348 9 > 0.93804 1.62473 2.10879 1 Zn1 2.82253 12 > -1.87611 -0.00002 2.10879 1 Zn1 2.82255 13 > 0.93804 -1.62477 2.10879 1 Zn1 2.82255 14 > 0.93804 1.62473 -3.09811 1 Zn1 3.62187 21 > -1.87611 -0.00002 -3.09811 1 Zn1 3.62189 22 > 0.93804 -1.62477 -3.09811 1 Zn1 3.62189 23 > -3.75219 0.00002 -0.49466 1 Zn1 3.78466 24 > 1.87611 -3.24948 -0.49466 1 Zn1 3.78465 25 > 1.87611 3.24952 -0.49466 1 Zn1 3.78469 26 > -3.75219 0.00002 1.30173 2 O1 3.97158 27 > 1.87611 -3.24948 1.30173 2 O1 3.97158 28 > -1.87611 3.24948 -1.30173 2 O1 3.97158 29 > 3.75219 -0.00002 -1.30173 2 O1 3.97158 30 > 1.87611 3.24952 1.30173 2 O1 3.97161 31 > -1.87611 -3.24952 -1.30173 2 O1 3.97161 32 > 2.81415 1.62475 2.60345 3 Er 4.16380 33 > -1.87611 3.24948 2.10879 1 Zn1 4.30417 45 > 3.75219 -0.00002 2.10879 1 Zn1 4.30418 46 >

1 0

Re: [Ifeffit] Problem reproducing spectrum for Ti complex (Josh Kas)
by joshua jason kas 03 Sep '08

03 Sep '08

Hi Janine, I think that distortions could play a role here. When I shift the central Ti atom by 0.1 angstroms in plane (perpendicular to the Cl bonds) to break the planar symmetry, I get a clear double pre-edge peak. 0.1 angstroms may be a bit large but 0.05 is certainly not, since 0.003 angstroms**2 is a very reasonable value for sigma**2. You could also estimate the distortion if you have more information about the debye waller factors, or even better, you could perform a molecular dynamics simulation and do a configurational average of the XANES spectra from snapshots. Below is the feff.inp file that I used. You might want to play with shifting the Ti atom in different directions too. Cheers, Josh Kas TITLE TiPcCl2 molecule Geom1acc CONTROL 1 1 1 1 1 1 PRINT 5 0 0 0 0 0 FMS 9.0 1 *1 appropriate for molecules (wiki) MULTIPOLE 2 *Dipole and quadrupole EXCHANGE 0 0 0 0 *Dirac Hara, -1eV Fermi level shift, -3 broadening SCF 8.0 1 *includes second coordination shell XANES 6.0 0.03 0.001 AFOLP 1.2 CRITERION 0 0 RPATH 0.1 SIG2 0.005 * emin emax eimag * LDOS -20 20 0.2 POTENTIALS *absorbing atom is the Ti *ipot z tag 0 22 Ti 1 6 C 2 7 N 3 1 H 4 17 Cl ATOMS 0 0.1 0 0 0 -0.00040276 -2.1184 -0.28392 2 2.13734 -2.11835 0.00044201 -0.284329 2 2.13734 0.00049691 2.11839 -0.284036 2 2.13734 2.11844 -0.00045764 -0.283627 2 2.13734 -0.00040584 6.782e-05 2.45003 4 2.45003 0.00040523 -6.766e-05 -2.45005 4 2.45005 -1.14859 2.9207 -0.359915 1 3.159 -1.14983 -2.92023 -0.359755 1 3.159 -2.92016 1.14988 -0.36016 1 3.159 -2.92065 -1.14866 -0.360097 1 3.159 1.14871 -2.92072 -0.359374 1 3.159 1.14995 2.92021 -0.359534 1 3.159 2.92028 -1.1499 -0.359129 1 3.159 2.92077 1.14864 -0.359192 1 3.159 -2.49915 2.50027 -0.371632 2 3.5546 -2.50021 -2.49922 -0.371494 2 3.5546 2.49928 -2.50029 -0.370665 2 3.5546 2.50034 2.4992 -0.370803 2 3.5546 -0.692606 4.24003 -0.468777 1 4.32173 -0.694406 -4.23976 -0.468544 1 4.32173 -4.23967 0.694471 -0.469267 1 4.32173 -4.23997 -0.692696 -0.469229 1 4.32173 0.692761 -4.24006 -0.468314 1 4.32173 0.694562 4.23974 -0.468547 1 4.32173 4.23983 -0.694497 -0.467823 1 4.32173 4.24012 0.69267 -0.467862 1 4.32173 -1.42292 5.42169 -0.582346 1 5.63547 -1.42522 -5.42112 -0.582048 1 5.63547 -5.42101 1.4253 -0.582898 1 5.63547 -5.42161 -1.42303 -0.58282 1 5.63547 1.42311 -5.42172 -0.581576 1 5.63547 1.42541 5.42109 -0.581873 1 5.63547 5.4212 -1.42533 -0.581023 1 5.63547 5.42181 1.423 -0.581101 1 5.63547 -2.50314 5.41265 -0.586151 3 5.99217 -2.50544 -5.41162 -0.585854 3 5.99217 -5.41151 2.50552 -0.586554 3 5.99217 -5.41257 -2.50326 -0.586416 3 5.99217 2.50334 -5.41269 -0.585024 3 5.99217 2.50564 5.41159 -0.585321 3 5.99217 5.4117 -2.50555 -0.584622 3 5.99217 5.41277 2.50322 -0.584759 3 5.99217 -0.705001 6.62658 -0.692551 1 6.69987 -0.707815 -6.62632 -0.692187 1 6.69987 -6.62618 0.707911 -0.693369 1 6.69987 -6.62648 -0.705135 -0.69333 1 6.69987 0.70523 -6.62662 -0.691953 1 6.69987 0.708044 6.62628 -0.692316 1 6.69987 6.62641 -0.707949 -0.691134 1 6.69987 6.62671 0.705096 -0.691173 1 6.69987 -1.23945 7.56123 -0.780998 3 7.70184 -1.24266 -7.56074 -0.780583 3 7.70184 -7.56059 1.24277 -0.781872 3 7.70184 -7.56112 -1.2396 -0.781804 3 7.70184 1.23971 -7.56127 -0.780172 3 7.70184 1.24292 7.5607 -0.780587 3 7.70184 7.56085 -1.24281 -0.779298 3 7.70184 7.56138 1.23956 -0.779366 3 7.70184 END On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, ifeffit-request(a)millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov wrote: > 1. Problem reproducing spectrum for Ti complex (Janine GRATTAGE) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:42:31 +0200 > From: Janine GRATTAGE <janine.grattage(a)esrf.fr> > Subject: [Ifeffit] Problem reproducing spectrum for Ti complex > To: Ifeffit(a)millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > Message-ID: <48B664F7.6010704(a)esrf.fr> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Dear IFEFFIT mailing list, > > I have been trying to reproduce the XANES spectrum of a titanium > compound (titanium phthalocyanine dichloride) using FEFF 8.4. The > overall shape is reproduced reasonably well, but I wanted to ask the > mailing list users if they have any ideas as to how to improve the > details such as the pre-edge (to give two distinct peaks) and peak > positions over the absorption edge. > > I have attached a file showing the experimental spectrum, two FEFF input > files and the corresponding XMU output files. These two files have the > same atomic co-ordinates for the molecule, but one has 'standard' > broadening and the Fermi level has been shifted by -1eV (geom1) where > the other has reduced experimental broadening (-3) a shifted Fermi > level, and smaller step size (geom1acc). > > I have tried changing the geometry of the molecule by moving one or both > of the Cl atoms, and by trying a flat molecular geometry rather than the > 'umbrella' shape in the attached files, but the spectra attached are the > best match to experiment. Any help or suggestions on improvements would > be greatly appreciated. > > Best regards and thanks in advance, > > Janine Grattage > > -- > Dr Janine GRATTAGE > Postdoctoral Fellow, ID26 > European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) > Sector 26, BP 220 > 6, rue Jules Horowitz, > 38043 Grenoble, Cedex 9, FRANCE > Tel: +33(0)4 38 88 19 30 > Email: janine.grattage(a)esrf.fr > >

1 0

Re: [Ifeffit] lanthanides convergence
by hebhop＠u.washington.edu 02 Sep '08

02 Sep '08

Hi Eugenio, You can use the lanczos algorithm for the matrix inverse. This is specified by setting the fourth option to the FMS card to 2. FMS 5.0 0 2 Also, make sure that the number of energy points is not set too large, that is check the parameter nex in the code. Set it to 150 or so. I have a feeling that it is set to 400. These two things should reduce the time by a factor of 4 at least. Cheers, Josh Kas > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: lanthanides convergence (Eugenio Otal) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 23:58:55 -0300 > From: "Eugenio Otal" <eugenioh(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] lanthanides convergence > To: ifeffit(a)millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > Message-ID: > <da22ad30809011958g484a5cfr750341645402fb74(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Bruce, > > thanks for your answer, it is a great problem to increase the number of > atoms, huge CPU time is needed to finish a calculation. > > Here I pasted the header and the first lines of the atom list and attached > the whole file, if somebody could help me to reduce the calculation time I > will be grateful. > > Thanks in advance, euG > > * This feff8 input file was generated by Artemis 0.8.011 > * Atoms written by and copyright (c) Bruce Ravel, 1998-2001 > > TITLE name: ZnO:Er 1 at no distortion d= 4.136 > TITLE formula: ZnO > TITLE sites: Zn1,O1 > TITLE refer1: wyckoff, vol 1, ch III, p 111 > TITLE refer2: > TITLE schoen: > TITLE notes1: > > * Er L3 edge energy = 8358.0 eV > EDGE L3 > S02 1.0 > > * pot xsph fms paths genfmt ff2chi > CONTROL 1 1 1 1 1 1 > PRINT 3 0 0 0 0 0 > > *** ixc=0 means to use Hedin-Lundqvist > * ixc [ Vr Vi ] > EXCHANGE 0 > > *** Radius of small cluster for > *** self-consistency calculation > *** A sphere including 2 shells is > *** a good choice > *** l_scf = 0 for a solid, 1 for a molecule > * r_scf [ l_scf n_scf ca ] > SCF 4.0 > > *** Upper limit of XANES calculation. > *** This *must* be uncommented to > *** make Feff calculate full multiple > *** scattering rather than a path expansion > * kmax [ delta_k delta_e ] > XANES 4.0 > > *** Radius of cluster for Full Multiple > *** Scattering calculation > *** l_fms = 0 for a solid, 1 for a molecule > * r_fms l_fms > FMS 5.00 0 > > *** Energy grid over which to calculate > *** DOS functions > * emin emax eimag > LDOS -30 20 0.1 > > *** for EXAFS: RMAX 12.0 and uncomment > *** the EXAFS card > RPATH 0.1 > *EXAFS 20 > > POTENTIALS > * ipot Z element l_scmt l_fms stoichiometry > 0 68 Er 3 3 0.001 > 1 30 Zn 2 2 2 > 2 8 O 1 1 2 > 3 68 Er 3 3 2 > > ATOMS * this list contains 902 atoms > * x y z ipot tag distance > 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0 Er 0.00000 0 > -0.93804 -1.62473 -0.49466 1 Zn1 1.94019 1 > 1.87611 0.00002 -0.49466 1 Zn1 1.94023 2 > -0.93804 1.62477 -0.49466 1 Zn1 1.94023 3 > -0.93804 -1.62473 1.30173 2 O1 2.28346 4 > 0.93804 1.62473 -1.30173 2 O1 2.28346 5 > 1.87611 0.00002 1.30173 2 O1 2.28348 6 > -0.93804 1.62477 1.30173 2 O1 2.28348 7 > -1.87611 -0.00002 -1.30173 2 O1 2.28348 8 > 0.93804 -1.62477 -1.30173 2 O1 2.28348 9 > 0.93804 1.62473 2.10879 1 Zn1 2.82253 12 > -1.87611 -0.00002 2.10879 1 Zn1 2.82255 13 > 0.93804 -1.62477 2.10879 1 Zn1 2.82255 14 > 0.93804 1.62473 -3.09811 1 Zn1 3.62187 21 > -1.87611 -0.00002 -3.09811 1 Zn1 3.62189 22 > 0.93804 -1.62477 -3.09811 1 Zn1 3.62189 23 > -3.75219 0.00002 -0.49466 1 Zn1 3.78466 24 > 1.87611 -3.24948 -0.49466 1 Zn1 3.78465 25 > 1.87611 3.24952 -0.49466 1 Zn1 3.78469 26 > -3.75219 0.00002 1.30173 2 O1 3.97158 27 > 1.87611 -3.24948 1.30173 2 O1 3.97158 28 > -1.87611 3.24948 -1.30173 2 O1 3.97158 29 > 3.75219 -0.00002 -1.30173 2 O1 3.97158 30 > 1.87611 3.24952 1.30173 2 O1 3.97161 31 > -1.87611 -3.24952 -1.30173 2 O1 3.97161 32 > 2.81415 1.62475 2.60345 3 Er 4.16380 33 > -1.87611 3.24948 2.10879 1 Zn1 4.30417 45 > 3.75219 -0.00002 2.10879 1 Zn1 4.30418 46 >

1 0

lanthanides convergence
by Eugenio Otal 01 Sep '08

01 Sep '08

Bruce, I am running feff to model XANES of Erbium doped ZnO. I have a big problem to find the convergence of FMS in this kind of systems. I increased the atoms number in feff code to nclusx=500 and still have not found convergence. Should I increase the nclusx to a bigger number?, is there a limit for this number independent from the computer RAM or I do have another chance?. Thanks for your time and patience. 8<- - - - - - 8<- - - - - - 8<- - - - - - 8<- - - - - - Eugenio H. Otal CINSO - CONICET - CITEFA eotal(a)citefa.gov.ar eugenioh(a)gmail.com 8<- - - - - - 8<- - - - - - 8<- - - - - - 8<- - - - - -

2 2

Problem reproducing spectrum for Ti complex
by Janine GRATTAGE 29 Aug '08

29 Aug '08

Dear IFEFFIT mailing list, I have been trying to reproduce the XANES spectrum of a titanium compound (titanium phthalocyanine dichloride) using FEFF 8.4. The overall shape is reproduced reasonably well, but I wanted to ask the mailing list users if they have any ideas as to how to improve the details such as the pre-edge (to give two distinct peaks) and peak positions over the absorption edge. I have attached a file showing the experimental spectrum, two FEFF input files and the corresponding XMU output files. These two files have the same atomic co-ordinates for the molecule, but one has 'standard' broadening and the Fermi level has been shifted by -1eV (geom1) where the other has reduced experimental broadening (-3) a shifted Fermi level, and smaller step size (geom1acc). I have tried changing the geometry of the molecule by moving one or both of the Cl atoms, and by trying a flat molecular geometry rather than the 'umbrella' shape in the attached files, but the spectra attached are the best match to experiment. Any help or suggestions on improvements would be greatly appreciated. Best regards and thanks in advance, Janine Grattage -- Dr Janine GRATTAGE Postdoctoral Fellow, ID26 European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) Sector 26, BP 220 6, rue Jules Horowitz, 38043 Grenoble, Cedex 9, FRANCE Tel: +33(0)4 38 88 19 30 Email: janine.grattage(a)esrf.fr TITLE TiPcCl2 molecule Geom1acc CONTROL 1 1 1 1 1 1 PRINT 5 0 0 0 0 0 FMS 8.0 1 *1 appropriate for molecules (wiki) MULTIPOLE 2 *Dipole and quadrupole EXCHANGE 0 1. -3. *Dirac Hara, -1eV Fermi level shift, -3 broadening SCF 4 *includes second coordination shell XANES 6.0 0.03 0.001 AFOLP 1.2 CRITERION 0 0 RPATH 0.1 * emin emax eimag LDOS -20 20 0.2 POTENTIALS *absorbing atom is the Ti *ipot z tag 0 22 Ti 1 6 C 2 7 N 3 1 H 4 17 Cl ATOMS *xmod ymod zmod ipot 0 0 0 0 2.11844236 -0.00045764 -0.28362660 2 0.00049691 2.11838749 -0.28403609 2 -2.11834820 0.00044201 -0.28432911 2 -0.00040276 -2.11840312 -0.28391961 2 2.50033703 2.49920371 -0.37080272 2 -2.49915235 2.50026531 -0.37163159 2 -2.50021397 -2.49922414 -0.37149421 2 2.49927541 -2.50028574 -0.37066535 2 2.92077159 1.14863904 -0.35919200 1 -1.14858929 2.92070211 -0.35991542 1 -2.92065235 -1.14865884 -0.36009724 1 1.14870854 -2.92072190 -0.35937383 1 2.92028351 -1.14989912 -0.35912883 1 1.14994884 2.92021403 -0.35953433 1 -2.92016426 1.14987932 -0.36016040 1 -1.14982959 -2.92023383 -0.35975490 1 4.24012097 0.69267038 -0.46786156 1 -0.69260556 4.24003046 -0.46877686 1 -4.23996562 -0.69269616 -0.46922925 1 0.69276092 -4.24005624 -0.46831395 1 4.23982641 -0.69449678 -0.46782344 1 0.69456158 4.23973590 -0.46854687 1 -4.23967106 0.69447100 -0.46926736 1 -0.69440621 -4.23976169 -0.46854393 1 5.42180506 1.42299661 -0.58110099 1 -1.42291609 5.42169266 -0.58234553 1 -5.42161213 -1.42302863 -0.58282014 1 1.42310907 -5.42172466 -0.58157559 1 5.42120023 -1.42533102 -0.58102274 1 1.42541150 5.42108783 -0.58187330 1 -5.42100730 1.42529900 -0.58289838 1 -1.42521852 -5.42111985 -0.58204782 1 6.62671213 0.70509648 -0.69117255 1 -0.70500071 6.62657845 -0.69255053 1 -6.62648265 -0.70513457 -0.69333050 1 0.70523027 -6.62661650 -0.69195251 1 6.62641208 -0.70794872 -0.69113373 1 0.70804448 6.62627840 -0.69231626 1 -6.62618259 0.70791063 -0.69336932 1 -0.70781492 -6.62631646 -0.69218678 1 5.41276801 2.50322415 -0.58475924 3 -2.50314311 5.41265491 -0.58615139 3 -5.41257388 -2.50325637 -0.58641595 3 2.50333729 -5.41268710 -0.58502379 3 5.41170441 -2.50555482 -0.58462164 3 2.50563579 5.41159131 -0.58532097 3 -5.41151028 2.50552260 -0.58655354 3 -2.50544161 -5.41162354 -0.58585421 3 7.56137780 1.23956000 -0.77936602 3 7.56085067 -1.24281398 -0.77929784 3 -7.56059192 1.24277103 -0.78187250 3 -7.56111904 -1.23960294 -0.78180432 3 -1.23945199 7.56122707 -0.78099842 3 1.24292195 7.56069994 -0.78058687 3 1.23971085 -7.56126996 -0.78017192 3 -1.24266309 -7.56074286 -0.78058347 3 0.00040523 -0.00006766 -2.45005490 4 -0.00040584 0.00006782 2.45002706 4 END # TiPcCl2 molecule Geom1acc Feff 8.40 # POT SCF 30 4.0000 0, core-hole, AFOLP (folp(0)= 1.200) # Abs Z=22 Rmt= 1.437 Rnm= 1.537 K shell # Pot 1 Z= 6 Rmt= 0.840 Rnm= 0.996 # Pot 2 Z= 7 Rmt= 0.885 Rnm= 1.008 # Pot 3 Z= 1 Rmt= 0.789 Rnm= 0.909 # Pot 4 Z=17 Rmt= 1.538 Rnm= 1.686 # Gam_ch=9.030E-01 H-L exch Vi=-3.000E+00 Vr= 1.000E+00 # Mu=-1.040E+01 kf=2.632E+00 Vint=-1.880E+01 Rs_int= 1.378 # FMS rfms= 8.0000 # PATH Rmax= 0.100, Keep_limit= 0.00, Heap_limit 0.00 Pwcrit= 0.00% # S02=1.000 Global_sig2= 0.00000 # file sig2 tot cw amp ratio deg nlegs reff inp sig2 # 0/ 0 paths used # xsedge+ 50, used to normalize mu 4.8609E-04 # ----------------------------------------------------------------------- # omega e k mu mu0 chi @# 4966.250 -12.512 -0.540 9.13165E-04 3.37112E-03 -2.45795E-03 4966.484 -12.279 -0.480 1.06274E-03 4.18380E-03 -3.12106E-03 4966.689 -12.074 -0.420 1.27282E-03 5.35021E-03 -4.07739E-03 4966.868 -11.895 -0.360 1.58625E-03 7.11910E-03 -5.53285E-03 4967.019 -11.744 -0.300 2.09217E-03 1.00069E-02 -7.91471E-03 4967.142 -11.621 -0.240 3.00252E-03 1.52351E-02 -1.22326E-02 4967.238 -11.525 -0.180 4.92381E-03 2.62777E-02 -2.13539E-02 4967.307 -11.456 -0.120 1.00982E-02 5.59015E-02 -4.58033E-02 4967.348 -11.415 -0.060 2.70590E-02 1.52513E-01 -1.25454E-01 4967.351 -11.412 -0.051 3.08226E-02 1.73905E-01 -1.43082E-01 4967.361 -11.402 0.000 4.35361E-02 2.46060E-01 -2.02524E-01 4967.365 -11.398 0.030 4.81925E-02 2.72502E-01 -2.24310E-01 4967.375 -11.388 0.060 5.99908E-02 3.39822E-01 -2.79831E-01 4967.392 -11.371 0.090 7.06798E-02 4.01939E-01 -3.31259E-01 4967.416 -11.347 0.120 7.66663E-02 4.38394E-01 -3.61727E-01 4967.447 -11.316 0.150 7.97483E-02 4.59111E-01 -3.79362E-01 4967.485 -11.278 0.180 8.14520E-02 4.72336E-01 -3.90884E-01 4967.529 -11.233 0.210 8.25377E-02 4.81982E-01 -3.99444E-01 4967.581 -11.182 0.240 8.33826E-02 4.89861E-01 -4.06478E-01 4967.639 -11.124 0.270 8.41397E-02 4.96841E-01 -4.12701E-01 4967.704 -11.059 0.300 8.48985E-02 5.03368E-01 -4.18469E-01 4967.776 -10.987 0.330 8.56237E-02 5.09640E-01 -4.24016E-01 4967.855 -10.908 0.360 8.62149E-02 5.15699E-01 -4.29484E-01 4967.941 -10.822 0.390 8.67731E-02 5.21557E-01 -4.34784E-01 4968.034 -10.729 0.420 8.78023E-02 5.27174E-01 -4.39371E-01 4968.133 -10.630 0.450 9.10340E-02 5.32553E-01 -4.41519E-01 4968.239 -10.524 0.480 1.04529E-01 5.37749E-01 -4.33220E-01 4968.352 -10.411 0.510 1.23575E-01 5.42866E-01 -4.19290E-01 4968.472 -10.291 0.540 1.10145E-01 5.48027E-01 -4.37883E-01 4968.599 -10.164 0.570 1.15424E-01 5.53380E-01 -4.37956E-01 4968.733 -10.030 0.600 1.29776E-01 5.59004E-01 -4.29228E-01 4968.874 -9.889 0.630 1.40253E-01 5.64967E-01 -4.24714E-01 4969.021 -9.742 0.660 1.30116E-01 5.71309E-01 -4.41194E-01 4969.175 -9.588 0.690 1.02880E-01 5.78006E-01 -4.75126E-01 4969.337 -9.426 0.720 7.82317E-02 5.85054E-01 -5.06823E-01 4969.505 -9.258 0.750 6.27424E-02 5.92438E-01 -5.29696E-01 4969.679 -9.084 0.780 5.40260E-02 6.00135E-01 -5.46109E-01 4969.861 -8.902 0.810 4.93417E-02 6.08094E-01 -5.58753E-01 4970.050 -8.713 0.840 4.72836E-02 6.16308E-01 -5.69025E-01 4970.245 -8.518 0.870 4.73852E-02 6.24726E-01 -5.77341E-01 4970.448 -8.315 0.900 5.02215E-02 6.33358E-01 -5.83136E-01 4970.657 -8.106 0.930 5.67812E-02 6.42152E-01 -5.85370E-01 4970.873 -7.890 0.960 6.13993E-02 6.51085E-01 -5.89686E-01 4971.096 -7.667 0.990 5.66943E-02 6.60139E-01 -6.03445E-01 4971.325 -7.438 1.020 6.16275E-02 6.69310E-01 -6.07683E-01 4971.562 -7.201 1.050 7.15826E-02 6.78561E-01 -6.06979E-01 4971.805 -6.958 1.080 6.00972E-02 6.87872E-01 -6.27775E-01 4972.056 -6.707 1.110 6.50374E-02 6.97223E-01 -6.32185E-01 4972.313 -6.450 1.140 7.38111E-02 7.06611E-01 -6.32800E-01 4972.577 -6.186 1.170 8.62661E-02 7.16016E-01 -6.29750E-01 4972.848 -5.915 1.200 1.03456E-01 7.25401E-01 -6.21944E-01 4973.126 -5.637 1.230 1.26524E-01 7.34746E-01 -6.08222E-01 4973.410 -5.353 1.260 1.54971E-01 7.44066E-01 -5.89095E-01 4973.702 -5.061 1.290 1.82740E-01 7.53341E-01 -5.70601E-01 4974.000 -4.763 1.320 2.00380E-01 7.62518E-01 -5.62138E-01 4974.305 -4.458 1.350 2.11141E-01 7.71629E-01 -5.60487E-01 4974.617 -4.146 1.380 2.30273E-01 7.80636E-01 -5.50363E-01 4974.936 -3.827 1.410 2.66899E-01 7.89521E-01 -5.22623E-01 4975.262 -3.501 1.440 3.21552E-01 7.98299E-01 -4.76747E-01 4975.594 -3.169 1.470 3.88177E-01 8.06915E-01 -4.18738E-01 4975.934 -2.829 1.500 4.53793E-01 8.15386E-01 -3.61592E-01 4976.280 -2.483 1.530 5.03101E-01 8.23710E-01 -3.20609E-01 4976.633 -2.130 1.560 5.32723E-01 8.31850E-01 -2.99127E-01 4976.993 -1.769 1.590 5.66560E-01 8.39805E-01 -2.73245E-01 4977.360 -1.403 1.620 6.34775E-01 8.47573E-01 -2.12798E-01 4977.734 -1.029 1.650 6.84473E-01 8.55136E-01 -1.70663E-01 4978.115 -0.648 1.680 6.71745E-01 8.62493E-01 -1.90748E-01 4978.502 -0.261 1.710 7.03172E-01 8.69644E-01 -1.66472E-01 4978.897 0.134 1.740 7.94749E-01 8.76587E-01 -8.18378E-02 4979.298 0.535 1.770 8.38553E-01 8.83285E-01 -4.47320E-02 4979.706 0.943 1.800 8.11564E-01 8.89757E-01 -7.81934E-02 4980.121 1.358 1.830 8.36275E-01 8.96019E-01 -5.97439E-02 4980.542 1.780 1.860 9.16563E-01 9.02018E-01 1.45451E-02 4980.971 2.208 1.890 1.00872E+00 9.07788E-01 1.00932E-01 4981.407 2.644 1.920 1.08114E+00 9.13312E-01 1.67828E-01 4981.849 3.086 1.950 1.11955E+00 9.18608E-01 2.00945E-01 4982.298 3.535 1.980 1.13308E+00 9.23657E-01 2.09423E-01 4982.754 3.991 2.010 1.14273E+00 9.28461E-01 2.14271E-01 4983.217 4.454 2.040 1.15283E+00 9.33035E-01 2.19790E-01 4983.687 4.924 2.070 1.15849E+00 9.37346E-01 2.21143E-01 4984.163 5.401 2.100 1.16452E+00 9.41447E-01 2.23068E-01 4984.647 5.884 2.130 1.18412E+00 9.45303E-01 2.38817E-01 4985.137 6.374 2.160 1.21498E+00 9.48932E-01 2.66044E-01 4985.634 6.872 2.190 1.24240E+00 9.52334E-01 2.90069E-01 4986.139 7.376 2.220 1.25155E+00 9.55511E-01 2.96036E-01 4986.649 7.887 2.250 1.23876E+00 9.58461E-01 2.80303E-01 4987.167 8.404 2.280 1.21617E+00 9.61204E-01 2.54969E-01 4987.692 8.929 2.310 1.20218E+00 9.63742E-01 2.38437E-01 4988.223 9.460 2.340 1.21246E+00 9.66074E-01 2.46388E-01 4988.762 9.999 2.370 1.25770E+00 9.68220E-01 2.89477E-01 4989.307 10.544 2.400 1.32791E+00 9.70161E-01 3.57749E-01 4989.859 11.096 2.430 1.38130E+00 9.71917E-01 4.09379E-01 4990.418 11.655 2.460 1.38220E+00 9.73507E-01 4.08696E-01 4990.984 12.221 2.490 1.34139E+00 9.74933E-01 3.66459E-01 4991.556 12.793 2.520 1.29626E+00 9.76174E-01 3.20089E-01 4992.136 13.373 2.550 1.27334E+00 9.77270E-01 2.96074E-01 4992.722 13.959 2.580 1.27044E+00 9.78222E-01 2.92220E-01 4993.315 14.552 2.610 1.26795E+00 9.79029E-01 2.88916E-01 4993.915 15.153 2.640 1.25051E+00 9.79692E-01 2.70818E-01 4994.522 15.759 2.670 1.21688E+00 9.80191E-01 2.36689E-01 TITLE TiPcCl2 molecule Geom1 CONTROL 1 1 1 1 1 1 PRINT 5 0 0 0 0 0 FMS 8.0 1 *1 appropriate for molecules (wiki) MULTIPOLE 2 *Dipole and quadrupole EXCHANGE 0 1 *Dirac Hara, -1eV Fermi level shift SCF 4 *includes second coordination shell XANES 6.0 0.05 0.01 AFOLP 1.2 CRITERION 0 0 *use all paths *RPATH 0.1 * emin emax eimag LDOS -20 20 0.2 POTENTIALS *absorbing atom is the Ti *ipot z tag 0 22 Ti 1 6 C 2 7 N 3 1 H 4 17 Cl ATOMS *xmod ymod zmod ipot 0 0 0 0 2.11844236 -0.00045764 -0.28362660 2 0.00049691 2.11838749 -0.28403609 2 -2.11834820 0.00044201 -0.28432911 2 -0.00040276 -2.11840312 -0.28391961 2 2.50033703 2.49920371 -0.37080272 2 -2.49915235 2.50026531 -0.37163159 2 -2.50021397 -2.49922414 -0.37149421 2 2.49927541 -2.50028574 -0.37066535 2 2.92077159 1.14863904 -0.35919200 1 -1.14858929 2.92070211 -0.35991542 1 -2.92065235 -1.14865884 -0.36009724 1 1.14870854 -2.92072190 -0.35937383 1 2.92028351 -1.14989912 -0.35912883 1 1.14994884 2.92021403 -0.35953433 1 -2.92016426 1.14987932 -0.36016040 1 -1.14982959 -2.92023383 -0.35975490 1 4.24012097 0.69267038 -0.46786156 1 -0.69260556 4.24003046 -0.46877686 1 -4.23996562 -0.69269616 -0.46922925 1 0.69276092 -4.24005624 -0.46831395 1 4.23982641 -0.69449678 -0.46782344 1 0.69456158 4.23973590 -0.46854687 1 -4.23967106 0.69447100 -0.46926736 1 -0.69440621 -4.23976169 -0.46854393 1 5.42180506 1.42299661 -0.58110099 1 -1.42291609 5.42169266 -0.58234553 1 -5.42161213 -1.42302863 -0.58282014 1 1.42310907 -5.42172466 -0.58157559 1 5.42120023 -1.42533102 -0.58102274 1 1.42541150 5.42108783 -0.58187330 1 -5.42100730 1.42529900 -0.58289838 1 -1.42521852 -5.42111985 -0.58204782 1 6.62671213 0.70509648 -0.69117255 1 -0.70500071 6.62657845 -0.69255053 1 -6.62648265 -0.70513457 -0.69333050 1 0.70523027 -6.62661650 -0.69195251 1 6.62641208 -0.70794872 -0.69113373 1 0.70804448 6.62627840 -0.69231626 1 -6.62618259 0.70791063 -0.69336932 1 -0.70781492 -6.62631646 -0.69218678 1 5.41276801 2.50322415 -0.58475924 3 -2.50314311 5.41265491 -0.58615139 3 -5.41257388 -2.50325637 -0.58641595 3 2.50333729 -5.41268710 -0.58502379 3 5.41170441 -2.50555482 -0.58462164 3 2.50563579 5.41159131 -0.58532097 3 -5.41151028 2.50552260 -0.58655354 3 -2.50544161 -5.41162354 -0.58585421 3 7.56137780 1.23956000 -0.77936602 3 7.56085067 -1.24281398 -0.77929784 3 -7.56059192 1.24277103 -0.78187250 3 -7.56111904 -1.23960294 -0.78180432 3 -1.23945199 7.56122707 -0.78099842 3 1.24292195 7.56069994 -0.78058687 3 1.23971085 -7.56126996 -0.78017192 3 -1.24266309 -7.56074286 -0.78058347 3 0.00040523 -0.00006766 -2.45005490 4 -0.00040584 0.00006782 2.45002706 4 END # TiPcCl2 molecule (positions calculated from ADF) Feff 8.40 # POT SCF 30 4.0000 0, core-hole, AFOLP (folp(0)= 1.200) # Abs Z=22 Rmt= 1.437 Rnm= 1.537 K shell # Pot 1 Z= 6 Rmt= 0.840 Rnm= 0.996 # Pot 2 Z= 7 Rmt= 0.885 Rnm= 1.008 # Pot 3 Z= 1 Rmt= 0.789 Rnm= 0.909 # Pot 4 Z=17 Rmt= 1.538 Rnm= 1.686 # Gam_ch=9.030E-01 H-L exch Vi= 0.000E+00 Vr= 1.000E+00 # Mu=-1.040E+01 kf=2.632E+00 Vint=-1.880E+01 Rs_int= 1.378 # FMS rfms= 8.0000 # PATH Rmax=-1.000, Keep_limit= 0.00, Heap_limit 0.00 Pwcrit= 0.00% # S02=1.000 Global_sig2= 0.00000 # file sig2 tot cw amp ratio deg nlegs reff inp sig2 # 0/ 0 paths used # xsedge+ 50, used to normalize mu 4.6992E-04 # ----------------------------------------------------------------------- # omega e k mu mu0 chi @# 4964.275 -14.488 -0.900 1.44077E-02 3.21565E-02 -1.77488E-02 4964.923 -13.840 -0.800 1.61993E-02 3.95010E-02 -2.33017E-02 4965.495 -13.268 -0.700 1.84771E-02 4.97434E-02 -3.12663E-02 4965.990 -12.773 -0.600 2.15278E-02 6.45932E-02 -4.30654E-02 4966.409 -12.354 -0.500 2.58451E-02 8.69527E-02 -6.11076E-02 4966.752 -12.011 -0.400 3.21686E-02 1.21157E-01 -8.89880E-02 4967.019 -11.744 -0.300 4.10037E-02 1.70217E-01 -1.29214E-01 4967.209 -11.554 -0.200 5.09103E-02 2.25913E-01 -1.75002E-01 4967.323 -11.440 -0.100 5.83015E-02 2.67539E-01 -2.09238E-01 4967.351 -11.412 -0.051 6.02274E-02 2.78296E-01 -2.18069E-01 4967.361 -11.402 0.000 6.09319E-02 2.82145E-01 -2.21213E-01 4967.371 -11.392 0.050 6.15821E-02 2.85805E-01 -2.24223E-01 4967.400 -11.363 0.100 6.35112E-02 2.96793E-01 -2.33281E-01 4967.447 -11.316 0.150 6.67307E-02 3.14931E-01 -2.48200E-01 4967.514 -11.249 0.200 7.10829E-02 3.39349E-01 -2.68267E-01 4967.600 -11.163 0.250 7.62645E-02 3.68148E-01 -2.91884E-01 4967.704 -11.059 0.300 8.19260E-02 3.98629E-01 -3.16703E-01 4967.828 -10.935 0.350 8.77714E-02 4.28185E-01 -3.40413E-01 4967.971 -10.792 0.400 9.37945E-02 4.55258E-01 -3.61463E-01 4968.133 -10.630 0.450 1.00145E-01 4.79354E-01 -3.79209E-01 4968.314 -10.449 0.500 1.06691E-01 5.00709E-01 -3.94018E-01 4968.514 -10.249 0.550 1.12394E-01 5.19879E-01 -4.07485E-01 4968.733 -10.030 0.600 1.15591E-01 5.37511E-01 -4.21920E-01 4968.971 -9.792 0.650 1.13910E-01 5.54177E-01 -4.40267E-01 4969.228 -9.535 0.700 1.06198E-01 5.70351E-01 -4.64152E-01 4969.505 -9.258 0.750 9.61631E-02 5.86343E-01 -4.90179E-01 4969.800 -8.963 0.800 8.86382E-02 6.02345E-01 -5.13707E-01 4970.114 -8.649 0.850 8.55330E-02 6.18458E-01 -5.32925E-01 4970.448 -8.315 0.900 8.67318E-02 6.34730E-01 -5.47998E-01 4970.800 -7.963 0.950 9.08250E-02 6.51152E-01 -5.60327E-01 4971.171 -7.592 1.000 9.64994E-02 6.67694E-01 -5.71195E-01 4971.562 -7.201 1.050 1.03277E-01 6.84334E-01 -5.81056E-01 4971.972 -6.791 1.100 1.11508E-01 7.01012E-01 -5.89504E-01 4972.400 -6.363 1.150 1.27017E-01 7.17678E-01 -5.90661E-01 4972.848 -5.915 1.200 1.51783E-01 7.34259E-01 -5.82476E-01 4973.315 -5.448 1.250 1.85121E-01 7.50729E-01 -5.65608E-01 4973.800 -4.963 1.300 2.22060E-01 7.66999E-01 -5.44939E-01 4974.305 -4.458 1.350 2.60104E-01 7.83015E-01 -5.22911E-01 4974.829 -3.934 1.400 3.10517E-01 7.98732E-01 -4.88216E-01 4975.372 -3.391 1.450 3.82202E-01 8.14085E-01 -4.31883E-01 4975.934 -2.829 1.500 4.63881E-01 8.29030E-01 -3.65149E-01 4976.515 -2.248 1.550 5.37065E-01 8.43501E-01 -3.06436E-01 4977.115 -1.648 1.600 6.07253E-01 8.57469E-01 -2.50216E-01 4977.734 -1.029 1.650 6.73937E-01 8.70893E-01 -1.96956E-01 4978.372 -0.391 1.700 7.30804E-01 8.83727E-01 -1.52923E-01 4979.030 0.267 1.750 8.02516E-01 8.95956E-01 -9.34395E-02 4979.706 0.943 1.800 8.54202E-01 9.07537E-01 -5.33342E-02 4980.401 1.638 1.850 9.26242E-01 9.18471E-01 7.77126E-03 4981.115 2.353 1.900 1.02684E+00 9.28720E-01 9.81182E-02 4981.849 3.086 1.950 1.10155E+00 9.38305E-01 1.63246E-01 4982.601 3.838 2.000 1.13866E+00 9.47198E-01 1.91459E-01 4983.373 4.610 2.050 1.16173E+00 9.55400E-01 2.06331E-01 4984.163 5.401 2.100 1.18362E+00 9.62930E-01 2.20694E-01 4984.973 6.210 2.150 1.21605E+00 9.69805E-01 2.46241E-01 4985.802 7.039 2.200 1.24599E+00 9.76015E-01 2.69973E-01 4986.649 7.887 2.250 1.25003E+00 9.81596E-01 2.68433E-01 4987.516 8.753 2.300 1.24364E+00 9.86570E-01 2.57068E-01 4988.402 9.639 2.350 1.26862E+00 9.90955E-01 2.77669E-01 4989.307 10.544 2.400 1.33164E+00 9.94768E-01 3.36871E-01 4990.231 11.468 2.450 1.36605E+00 9.98067E-01 3.67984E-01 4991.174 12.411 2.500 1.33716E+00 1.00084E+00 3.36318E-01 4992.136 13.373 2.550 1.30098E+00 1.00317E+00 2.97807E-01 4993.117 14.354 2.600 1.28188E+00 1.00505E+00 2.76824E-01 4994.117 15.354 2.650 1.24913E+00 1.00652E+00 2.42606E-01 4995.136 16.373 2.700 1.19116E+00 1.00762E+00 1.83538E-01 4996.174 17.412 2.750 1.12334E+00 1.00839E+00 1.14945E-01 4997.232 18.469 2.800 1.05879E+00 1.00886E+00 4.99339E-02 4998.308 19.545 2.850 1.00361E+00 1.00905E+00 -5.44234E-03 4999.403 20.640 2.900 9.66190E-01 1.00899E+00 -4.28024E-02 5000.518 21.755 2.950 9.53894E-01 1.00874E+00 -5.48451E-02 5001.651 22.888 3.000 9.61104E-01 1.00831E+00 -4.72049E-02 5002.804 24.041 3.050 9.70657E-01 1.00771E+00 -3.70537E-02 5003.975 25.212 3.100 9.65699E-01 1.00699E+00 -4.12896E-02 5005.166 26.403 3.150 9.43779E-01 1.00616E+00 -6.23849E-02 5006.376 27.613 3.200 9.12270E-01 1.00527E+00 -9.29971E-02 5007.604 28.841 3.250 8.79909E-01 1.00430E+00 -1.24395E-01 5008.852 30.089 3.300 8.53592E-01 1.00330E+00 -1.49707E-01 5010.119 31.356 3.350 8.37319E-01 1.00228E+00 -1.64962E-01 5011.405 32.642 3.400 8.32342E-01 1.00126E+00 -1.68915E-01 5012.710 33.947 3.450 8.37897E-01 1.00024E+00 -1.62341E-01 5014.034 35.271 3.500 8.52224E-01 9.99254E-01 -1.47030E-01 5015.377 36.614 3.550 8.73066E-01 9.98292E-01 -1.25226E-01 5016.739 37.976 3.600 8.98424E-01 9.97383E-01 -9.89589E-02 5018.120 39.357 3.650 9.25999E-01 9.96535E-01 -7.05367E-02 5019.520 40.757 3.700 9.53423E-01 9.95731E-01 -4.23079E-02 5020.939 42.176 3.750 9.78294E-01 9.94988E-01 -1.66939E-02 5022.378 43.615 3.800 9.98847E-01 9.94307E-01 4.53986E-03 5023.835 45.072 3.850 1.01451E+00 9.93705E-01 2.08018E-02 5025.311 46.548 3.900 1.02568E+00 9.93184E-01 3.25003E-02 5026.807 48.044 3.950 1.03332E+00 9.92711E-01 4.06132E-02 5028.321 49.558 4.000 1.03851E+00 9.92313E-01 4.61965E-02 5029.855 51.092 4.050 1.04223E+00 9.91980E-01 5.02542E-02 5031.407 52.644 4.100 1.04512E+00 9.91711E-01 5.34115E-02 5032.979 54.216 4.150 1.04746E+00 9.91501E-01 5.59600E-02 5034.570 55.807 4.200 1.04937E+00 9.91335E-01 5.80315E-02 5036.179 57.416 4.250 1.05095E+00 9.91211E-01 5.97411E-02 5037.808 59.045 4.300 1.05246E+00 9.91143E-01 6.13166E-02 5039.456 60.693 4.350 1.05412E+00 9.91101E-01 6.30208E-02 5041.123 62.360 4.400 1.05575E+00 9.91083E-01 6.46637E-02 5042.809 64.046 4.450 1.05588E+00 9.91095E-01 6.47840E-02

2 1

Comparison of "amp" between Feff8.40 and feff6 - Curved waves or Plane waves?
by Ying Zou 29 Aug '08

29 Aug '08

Dear all, Nice to get so prompt response from Bruce and Scott, thanks for their effort to make this list vital! Looks like "amp" is a factor which can be reduced. Then there is a question: how would all paths be sorted? by Reff or by "amp"? More techically related another question is then: can FEFFIT and FEFF work seamless together on this? Is there any presumption in FEFFIT (or more explicityly, ARTEMIS/ATHENA) which assumes all the paths have been sorted by descending "amp" down from 100% with ascending REFF? The background story behind this: using the same structural model (thanks Bruce!), I tried to fit either use paths from FEFF840 or from FEFF6. The fitting with FEFF6 paths does a quite good job, giving a R_factor~1%, reduced chi square~ 90. Yet the one with FEFF840 paths terminates abnormally because two parameters cannot be determined. Attached please find two ARTEMIS project files. And appreciate for comments! Ying Ying Zou Research Assoc., Dr. Phys. Physics Department, UWM

2 1

Re: [Ifeffit] Comparison of "amp" between Feff8.40 and feff6 - Curved waves or Plane waves?
by Ying Zou 29 Aug '08

29 Aug '08

Dear all, While I am calculating FEFF path through Feff8.40 using the "feff8.inp" as attached, I notice that the value of "amp" shown on "FEFF interpretation page" for some paths goes over 100%. For example, path 14 has a Reff=3.9317 far away from first shell, yet it has an "amp"=169.913. On the contrary, if I do the same in Artemis through embedded Feff6.0(using "feff6.inp"), none of paths has an "amp" over 100%. I am guessing this could be all right because Feff8 is using curved waves Feff6 instead plane waves. Any comments on this would be greatly appreciated! Ying Ying Zou Research Assoc., Dr.Phys. Physics Department, UWM =======================feff8.inp======================================= * This feff.inp file generated by ATOMS, version 2.50 * ATOMS written by and copyright (c) Bruce Ravel, 1992-1999 * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * * total mu = 5194.4 cm^-1, delta mu = 761.6 cm^-1 * specific gravity = 7.942, cluster contains 25 atoms. * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * * mcmaster corrections: 0.00093 ang^2 and 0.165E-05 ang^4 * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * TITLE Perovskite: PbTiO3 EDGE K S02 1.0 * pot xsph fms paths genfmt ff2chi CONTROL 1 1 1 1 1 1 PRINT 1 0 0 0 0 3 * r_scf [ l_scf n_scf ca ] SCF 3.88586 0 15 0.1 * ixc [ Vr Vi ] EXCHANGE 0 0 0 EXAFS RPATH 7.77172 * kmax [ delta_k delta_e ] *XANES 4.0 0.07 0.5 * r_fms [ l_fms ] *FMS 3.88586 ******** * *RPATH 0.10000 * emin emax resolution *LDOS -20 20 0.1 POTENTIALS * ipot z [ label l_scmt l_fms stoichiometry ] 0 22 Ti -1 -1 0 1 8 O -1 -1 3 2 82 Pb -1 -1 1 3 22 Ti -1 -1 1 ATOMS 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0 Ti 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.76630 1 Oapical 1.76630 1.95250 0.00000 0.32417 1 Oplanar 1.97923 0.00000 -1.95250 0.32417 1 Oplanar 1.97923 -1.95250 0.00000 0.32417 1 Oplanar 1.97923 0.00000 1.95250 0.32417 1 Oplanar 1.97923 0.00000 0.00000 2.38970 1 Oapical 2.38970 -1.95250 -1.95250 1.91592 2 Pb 3.36084 1.95250 -1.95250 1.91592 2 Pb 3.36084 -1.95250 1.95250 1.91592 2 Pb 3.36084 1.95250 1.95250 1.91592 2 Pb 3.36084 1.95250 -1.95250 -2.24008 2 Pb 3.55563 -1.95250 1.95250 -2.24008 2 Pb 3.55563 -1.95250 -1.95250 -2.24008 2 Pb 3.55563 1.95250 1.95250 -2.24008 2 Pb 3.55563 -3.90500 0.00000 0.00000 3 Ti 3.90500 0.00000 3.90500 0.00000 3 Ti 3.90500 3.90500 0.00000 0.00000 3 Ti 3.90500 0.00000 -3.90500 0.00000 3 Ti 3.90500 0.00000 0.00000 4.15600 3 Ti 4.15600 0.00000 0.00000 -4.15600 3 Ti 4.15600 3.90500 0.00000 -1.76630 1 Oapical 4.28589 0.00000 -3.90500 -1.76630 1 Oapical 4.28589 -3.90500 0.00000 -1.76630 1 Oapical 4.28589 0.00000 3.90500 -1.76630 1 Oapical 4.28589 END ============================================================================ ========================feff6.inp========================================== * This feff6 input file was generated by Artemis 0.8.011 * Atoms written by and copyright (c) Bruce Ravel, 1998-2001 * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * * total mu*x=1: 2.06 microns, unit edge step: 13.38 microns * specific gravity = 7.942 * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * * Normalization correction: 0.00048 ang^2 * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * * ----------------------------------------------------------------- * The following crystallographic data were used: * * title Pb Ti O3 * title Glazer A M * title # Powder profile refinement of lead zirconate titanate at several temperatures. * title # II. Pure PbTiO3 * title # Locality: synthetic * title # Sample: T = 25 C * space = P 4 m m * a = 3.9050 b = 3.9050 c = 4.1560 * alpha = 90.0 beta = 90.0 gamma = 90.0 * core = Ti edge = K * atoms * ! elem x y z tag occ * Pb 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Pb 1.00000 * Ti 0.50000 0.50000 0.53900 Ti 1.00000 * O 0.50000 0.50000 0.11400 Oapical 1.00000 * O 0.50000 0.00000 0.61700 Oplanar 1.00000 * ----------------------------------------------------------------- TITLE Pb Ti O3 TITLE Glazer A M TITLE # Powder profile refinement of lead zirconate titanate at several temperatures. TITLE # II. Pure PbTiO3 TITLE # Locality: synthetic TITLE # Sample: T = 25 C HOLE 1 1.0 * Ti K edge (4966.0 eV), second number is S0^2 * mphase,mpath,mfeff,mchi CONTROL 1 1 1 1 PRINT 1 0 0 0 RMAX 4.29550 *CRITERIA curved plane *DEBYE temp debye-temp NLEG 4 POTENTIALS * ipot Z element 0 22 Ti 1 82 Pb 2 22 Ti 3 8 O ATOMS * this list contains 25 atoms * x y z ipot tag distance 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0 Ti 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.76630 3 Oapical_1 1.76630 1.95250 0.00000 0.32417 3 Oplanar_1 1.97923 -1.95250 0.00000 0.32417 3 Oplanar_1 1.97923 0.00000 1.95250 0.32417 3 Oplanar_1 1.97923 0.00000 -1.95250 0.32417 3 Oplanar_1 1.97923 0.00000 0.00000 2.38970 3 Oapical_2 2.38970 1.95250 1.95250 1.91592 1 Pb_1 3.36084 -1.95250 1.95250 1.91592 1 Pb_1 3.36084 1.95250 -1.95250 1.91592 1 Pb_1 3.36084 -1.95250 -1.95250 1.91592 1 Pb_1 3.36084 1.95250 1.95250 -2.24008 1 Pb_2 3.55563 -1.95250 1.95250 -2.24008 1 Pb_2 3.55563 1.95250 -1.95250 -2.24008 1 Pb_2 3.55563 -1.95250 -1.95250 -2.24008 1 Pb_2 3.55563 3.90500 0.00000 0.00000 2 Ti_1 3.90500 -3.90500 0.00000 0.00000 2 Ti_1 3.90500 0.00000 3.90500 0.00000 2 Ti_1 3.90500 0.00000 -3.90500 0.00000 2 Ti_1 3.90500 0.00000 0.00000 4.15600 2 Ti_2 4.15600 0.00000 0.00000 -4.15600 2 Ti_2 4.15600 3.90500 0.00000 -1.76630 3 Oapical_3 4.28589 -3.90500 0.00000 -1.76630 3 Oapical_3 4.28589 0.00000 3.90500 -1.76630 3 Oapical_3 4.28589 0.00000 -3.90500 -1.76630 3 Oapical_3 4.28589 END ========================================================================

4 3

Re: [Ifeffit] charge transfer by SCF in FEFF8 and simulation for charge disproportionation
by Ying Zou 28 Aug '08

28 Aug '08

Dear all, I am doing a SCF calculation by Feff8.40 for a model compound PbTiO3. However, the obtained charge transfer deviates far away from its well-known formal oxidation state. According to common electron negativity data, the oxidation state would be: Pb 2+ Ti 4+ O 2- The SCF run gave out charge transfer for those atoms as following: Pb 0.717 Ti 0.181 O -0.300 After I read through the existing threads on charge transfer in this list, I know that transfered charge FEFF gives out is just a portion of general formal oxidation state. Can we undderstand that this is just ionic portion for entire bonding? Such as for oxygen, "-0.300" is ionic bonding, while the rest of valency (-1.700) exists as covalent bonding, which doesn't have apparent charge transfer by definition. Another related question is then: is there any way in FEFF to take into account this "covalence" part? (maybe deriving from overlapping area of mufftin-potential?) I think this may be crucial for a self-consistent analysis of charge disproportionation. Any comments on this would be greatly appreciated. Attached please see"atom.inp" and "feff.inp". Thanks so much! Ying Ying Zou Research associate,Dr. Phys. Physics Department, UWM ***************atoms.inp*********************************** ! This atoms input file was generated by WebAtoms 1.8 (Atoms 3.0beta10) ! Atoms written by and copyright (c) Bruce Ravel, 1998-2001 title = Perovskite: PbTiO3 space = p 4 m m a = 3.9050 b = 3.9050 c = 4.1560 alpha = 90.0 beta = 90.0 gamma = 90.0 core = Ti edge = K rmax = 4.2950 atoms ! elem x y z tag occ. Pb 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 Pb 1.00000 Ti 0.50000 0.50000 0.53900 Ti 1.00000 O 0.50000 0.50000 0.11400 Oapical 1.00000 O 0.50000 0.00000 0.61700 Oplanar 1.00000 ****************************************************************** ************feff.inp*************************************** * This feff.inp file generated by ATOMS, version 2.50 * ATOMS written by and copyright (c) Bruce Ravel, 1992-1999 * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * * total mu = 5194.4 cm^-1, delta mu = 761.6 cm^-1 * specific gravity = 7.942, cluster contains 25 atoms. * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * * mcmaster corrections: 0.00093 ang^2 and 0.165E-05 ang^4 * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * -- * TITLE Perovskite: PbTiO3 EDGE K S02 1.0 * pot xsph fms paths genfmt ff2chi CONTROL 1 1 1 1 1 1 PRINT 1 0 0 0 0 3 * r_scf [ l_scf n_scf ca ] SCF 3.88586 0 15 0.1 * ixc [ Vr Vi ] EXCHANGE 0 0 0 EXAFS RPATH 7.77172 * kmax [ delta_k delta_e ] *XANES 4.0 0.07 0.5 * r_fms [ l_fms ] *FMS 3.88586 ******** * *RPATH 0.10000 * emin emax resolution *LDOS -20 20 0.1 POTENTIALS * ipot z [ label l_scmt l_fms stoichiometry ] 0 22 Ti -1 -1 0 1 8 O -1 -1 3 2 82 Pb -1 -1 1 3 22 Ti -1 -1 1 ATOMS 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0 Ti 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.76630 1 Oapical 1.76630 1.95250 0.00000 0.32417 1 Oplanar 1.97923 0.00000 -1.95250 0.32417 1 Oplanar 1.97923 -1.95250 0.00000 0.32417 1 Oplanar 1.97923 0.00000 1.95250 0.32417 1 Oplanar 1.97923 0.00000 0.00000 2.38970 1 Oapical 2.38970 -1.95250 -1.95250 1.91592 2 Pb 3.36084 1.95250 -1.95250 1.91592 2 Pb 3.36084 -1.95250 1.95250 1.91592 2 Pb 3.36084 1.95250 1.95250 1.91592 2 Pb 3.36084 1.95250 -1.95250 -2.24008 2 Pb 3.55563 -1.95250 1.95250 -2.24008 2 Pb 3.55563 -1.95250 -1.95250 -2.24008 2 Pb 3.55563 1.95250 1.95250 -2.24008 2 Pb 3.55563 -3.90500 0.00000 0.00000 3 Ti 3.90500 0.00000 3.90500 0.00000 3 Ti 3.90500 3.90500 0.00000 0.00000 3 Ti 3.90500 0.00000 -3.90500 0.00000 3 Ti 3.90500 0.00000 0.00000 4.15600 3 Ti 4.15600 0.00000 0.00000 -4.15600 3 Ti 4.15600 3.90500 0.00000 -1.76630 1 Oapical 4.28589 0.00000 -3.90500 -1.76630 1 Oapical 4.28589 -3.90500 0.00000 -1.76630 1 Oapical 4.28589 0.00000 3.90500 -1.76630 1 Oapical 4.28589 END *******************************************************************

2 1

Re: [Ifeffit] Quick question about atoms.exe and .cif files
by Bruce Ravel 26 Aug '08

26 Aug '08

On Tuesday 26 August 2008 01:44:03 you wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > I have atoms running well, but whenever I input a simple diamond > structure .cif file (like the attached silicon.cif file), I get the wrong > structure. I've tried everything that I could think of, but it doesn't > work. I'm not sure if it is something I'm doing wrong, or something > intrinsic in the .cif file. I'm currently running the command line program > with the command "atoms.exe -u -o "silicon.inf" "Silicon.cif"", with the > files being appropriately loaded. If you get the chance could you tell me > if it is an easy problem that I can quickly fix (and the solution), or if > it is something more in depth: I'd appreciate it. > > Zak I am forwarding this question to the Ifeffit mailing list. This is the sort of question for which that forum was created. Please make use of it. http://cars9.uchicago.edu/iffwiki/BruceRavel/FormLetters/HelpRequest As the warning message says, "F d -3 m" is one of those space groups in the International Tables that offers two choices for the position of the origin. There is no way to correct that from the command line, so your two options are: 1. Use Artemis to generate your unit cell file and apply the shift vector given in the warning message or 2. Edit the cif file to put the Si atom at (1/8,1/8,1/8) B -- Bruce Ravel ------------------------------------ bravel(a)bnl.gov National Institute of Standards and Technology Synchrotron Methods Group at NSLS --- Beamlines U7A, X24A, X23A2 Building 535A Upton NY, 11973 My homepage: http://xafs.org/BruceRavel EXAFS software: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ravel/software/exafs/

1 0

(no subject)
by Hashem Stietiya 25 Aug '08

25 Aug '08

Dr. Calvin, I appreciate your prompt reply. I will work on your suggestions and get back to you soon. Meanwhile, can you please tell what is meant by 'A Bessel window with a smoothing parameter of 4?' I read that in a couple of publications where they indicate that is used to suppress artifacts. Is the smoothing parameter the dk? Thanks again. Regards, Hashem Stietiya Louisiana State University

2 1