Re: [Ifeffit] Demeter deglitch problem

14 Dec 2013

      Dear Matt and Bruce

Thanks a lot for your help,

I noticed your suggestions, regarding the deglitch problem, I installed the
Demeter in another drive than in drive C.

Now it seems  working well except some minor things, I can remove the
points from the data, the random point selection by software  works better
for rebinned data. I think the only problem I have now is I still cannot
move the cursor after double click (I can only remove the points which the
software decides - at least now it choose the points where I double click).
When i move my mouse cursor on the plot, it shows the correct coordinates.

I have one clarifications, when u choose the option to deglitch the data
(rebinned or non rebinned data), does the x(E) data plot looks like in the
attached file (line) or it looks like sets of blue round points same size
as cursor.

I think, the issue is solved except that I cannot move the randomly chosen
point.

Thanks a lot
Sathish

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:10 PM,
wrote:
...
Send Ifeffit mailing list submissions to
        ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        ifeffit-request@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
You can reach the person managing the list at
        ifeffit-owner@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Fwd: Re: Demeter deglitch problem (Matt Newville)
   2. Handling time resolved data (Ditty Dixon)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:20:05 -0600
From: Matt Newville 
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit ,
        Sathish Mayanna 
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] Fwd: Re: Demeter deglitch problem
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sathish, Bruce,
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Bruce Ravel  wrote:
...
Sathish,
I'm sorry, Sathish, but I simply don't see this behavior, on any of
the computers I have tried.
I have no trouble putting the cursor on the point in question.  It can
be a little tricky getting the cursor on, for example, one of the
points from 6750 to 6770.  That is because of the details of the
algorithm that tries to find the actual data point that is closest to
whatever point was clicked on.  For a data point that is not a distant
outlier, pretty good aim is required.
That said, the two points near 6864 are distant outliers.  Hitting one
and not the other might be hard, but hitting one of them is easy.
I am not disputing that you are having trouble.  I am just saying that
given the data you sent and the explanation you gave, I cannot
reproduce the behavior, so I don't know what I can do to help.
I made what I thought were two concrete suggestions / observations to
Satish,
  a)  I do not see k space data, and think you probably shouldn't either.
  b)  If you just move the mouse around on the plot window,
       do you see the correct coordinates?
I am sure Satish read Bruce's instructions on reporting bugs, but it
would have been polite if he had followed them.  He did not answer the
questions designed to help diagnose the problem. He did not respond
not to the list, but directly to Bruce.  In fact, he asked Bruce if
anyone else had seen the problem!
Satish, it would be very much appreciated if this conversation
remained on the mailing list.   If a problem happens for you, it is
possible that it will happen (or has happened) for someone else.
You'll get much better help and be helping others if you use the
mailing list.
--Matt
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:00:11 +0100
From: Ditty Dixon 
To: ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
Subject: [Ifeffit] Handling time resolved data
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Dear Bruce,
Recenetly we  did some time resolved measurements, QEXAFS mode. While the
old Athena arranged the file as we want i.e file 1, 2, 3 etc, the new did
it bit different 1, 11 12  and again 2, 21 etc. Screenshot attached. Why is
it doing diffrently for the two version? Can it be fixed some how.
Thank you,
Ditty
--
Ditty Dixon,
Anorganische Chemie
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Kaiserstr 12
Karlsruhe, Germany
Ph no:  004972160848093