Dear Matt and Bruce

Thanks a lot for your help, 

I noticed your suggestions, regarding the deglitch problem, I installed the Demeter in another drive than in drive C.

Now it seems  working well except some minor things, I can remove the points from the data, the random point selection by software  works better for rebinned data. I think the only problem I have now is I still cannot move the cursor after double click (I can only remove the points which the software decides - at least now it choose the points where I double click). When i move my mouse cursor on the plot, it shows the correct coordinates. 

I have one clarifications, when u choose the option to deglitch the data (rebinned or non rebinned data), does the x(E) data plot looks like in the attached file (line) or it looks like sets of blue round points same size as cursor. 

I think, the issue is solved except that I cannot move the randomly chosen point.

Thanks a lot
Sathish    


On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:10 PM, <ifeffit-request@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov> wrote:
Send Ifeffit mailing list submissions to
        ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        ifeffit-request@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov

You can reach the person managing the list at
        ifeffit-owner@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Fwd: Re: Demeter deglitch problem (Matt Newville)
   2. Handling time resolved data (Ditty Dixon)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:20:05 -0600
From: Matt Newville <newville@cars.uchicago.edu>
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit <ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov>,
        Sathish Mayanna <satty334@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] Fwd: Re: Demeter deglitch problem
Message-ID:
        <CA+7ESbpvTztp7Q8zTvShm8DO9yEjuo_2J6VuxtgnDWUNqk=1qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Sathish, Bruce,

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Bruce Ravel <bravel@bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Sathish,
>
> I'm sorry, Sathish, but I simply don't see this behavior, on any of
> the computers I have tried.
>
> I have no trouble putting the cursor on the point in question.  It can
> be a little tricky getting the cursor on, for example, one of the
> points from 6750 to 6770.  That is because of the details of the
> algorithm that tries to find the actual data point that is closest to
> whatever point was clicked on.  For a data point that is not a distant
> outlier, pretty good aim is required.
>
> That said, the two points near 6864 are distant outliers.  Hitting one
> and not the other might be hard, but hitting one of them is easy.
>
> I am not disputing that you are having trouble.  I am just saying that
> given the data you sent and the explanation you gave, I cannot
> reproduce the behavior, so I don't know what I can do to help.

I made what I thought were two concrete suggestions / observations to Satish,
  a)  I do not see k space data, and think you probably shouldn't either.
  b)  If you just move the mouse around on the plot window,
       do you see the correct coordinates?

I am sure Satish read Bruce's instructions on reporting bugs, but it
would have been polite if he had followed them.  He did not answer the
questions designed to help diagnose the problem. He did not respond
not to the list, but directly to Bruce.  In fact, he asked Bruce if
anyone else had seen the problem!

Satish, it would be very much appreciated if this conversation
remained on the mailing list.   If a problem happens for you, it is
possible that it will happen (or has happened) for someone else.
You'll get much better help and be helping others if you use the
mailing list.

--Matt


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:00:11 +0100
From: Ditty Dixon <ditty.dixon@gmail.com>
To: ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
Subject: [Ifeffit] Handling time resolved data
Message-ID:
        <CABPBYUcg8DSWDnvdiK=j9nfORORjG9n0RMYm4pVsaq6sYQYa3w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear Bruce,

Recenetly we  did some time resolved measurements, QEXAFS mode. While the
old Athena arranged the file as we want i.e file 1, 2, 3 etc, the new did
it bit different 1, 11 12  and again 2, 21 etc. Screenshot attached. Why is
it doing diffrently for the two version? Can it be fixed some how.

Thank you,

Ditty



--
Ditty Dixon,
Anorganische Chemie
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Kaiserstr 12
Karlsruhe, Germany
Ph no:  004972160848093
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20131213/2a789d6b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Capture_new_Athena.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 98659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20131213/2a789d6b/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Capture_old_Athena.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 103552 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20131213/2a789d6b/attachment-0001.png>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit


End of Ifeffit Digest, Vol 130, Issue 19
****************************************



--
Satty