Hi Eugenio,
Hm, sorry for the trouble. I thought I fixed saving filtered chi(k) (or a similar problem) a few months ago, but I see that too. I’ll look into it.
I guess I am not sure I understand what you are saying about displaying the fits for chi(k) and chi(q) [= filtered chi(k)]. Those plots don’t look wrong to me – should I be seeing something subtle?
--Matt
________________________________
From: Otal Eugenio via Ifeffit
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2024 11:37 PM
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Cc: Otal Eugenio
Subject: [Ifeffit] Problem with fit data export
Dear all, I was exporting the filtered data and found Larch is not exporting the filtered data. No new files were found in the folder I was saving the files. I found a victory in doing it from the plotting window after fitting, File > Export
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Dear all,
I was exporting the filtered data and found Larch is not exporting the filtered data. No new files were found in the folder I was saving the files.
I found a victory in doing it from the plotting window after fitting, File > Export data.
I exported the chi(k) with chi(q), chi(k) with the fit and chi(q) with the fit. All included bellow.
The signal in chi(k) with its fit and chi(q) with its fit, both match well.
The fit shown chi(k) and chi(q) has different aspects.
Am I wrong or the fit should look the same in both cases?
Is there any compensation for the window used?
Do I need to change something in the configuration to export it properly?
Best regards
[cid:ii_m29xat693]
[cid:ii_m29twa9l2]
[cid:ii_m29tvijv1]
(^ㅇᆽㅇ^)(=˃ᆺ˂=)(=🝦 ༝ 🝦=)
Eugenio H. OTAL
Assistant Professor
Research Initiative for Supra Materials,
Shinshu University
4-17-1 Wakasato, Nagano city.
380-8553, Japan
eugenio_otal@shinshu-u.ac.jpmailto:eugenio_otal@shinshu-u.ac.jp
¯\_(ツ)_/¯¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Who is John Galt?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯¯\_(ツ)_/¯
