[Ifeffit] [Ext] Re: Question about mixed second coordination shell

Wed Jan 17 01:40:14 CST 2024

Dear Carlo,
Thanks for your answer.
Yes, it is a layered material. I was measuring in situ the transformation
from O3 to P3.
I am not sure that Na atoms are ordered, it is a light element in a layered
structure and I applied some cycles to form the electrolyte-cathode
interphase, and disorder can be found there. I shook the structure a
little, your observation is correct.
I compared the spectra of a non-cycled one (blue) with a cycled one (red)
and the differences are minimal.
[image: image.png][image: image.png]
I was measuring all the edges, all showed the same problem, Na is
impossible to include in the fitting.
The goal was to monitor changes in the first coordination shell during the
battery operation. I found all the necessary information to understand the
system.
To fit the second coordination shell was attempted to evaluate the Na
concentration along the cycles and complement the electrochemical
measurements.
Best regards.

(^ㅇᆽㅇ^)(=˃ᆺ˂=)(=🝦 ༝ 🝦=)

Eugenio H. OTAL
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Materials Chemistry
Shinshu University
4-17-1 Wakasato, Nagano 380-8553, JAPAN
eugenio_otal at shinshu-u.ac.jp
https://sites.google.com/view/zettsu-laboratory/news-updates

¯\_(ツ)_/¯¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Who is John Galt?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯¯\_(ツ)_/¯

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 2:56 PM Carlo Segre <segre at iit.edu> wrote:

> Hi Eugenio:
>
> This looks like a layered structure, most likely a P2 or P3 phase.  Is
> this correct?  How sure are you that you have a single phase and that the
> Na ions are well ordered?  Is it possible that there is so much disorder in
> the M-Na distances that they wash out any contribution?  In that case, the
> second M-O distance would probably be more important.  You also do not
> mention if this is Ni, Fe or Mn edge data.  Is it possible that these
> differ?
>
> Carlo
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:30 PM Otal Eugenio <
> eugenio_otal at shinshu-u.ac.jp> wrote:
>
>> Dear Robert,
>> Thanks for your detailed answer.
>> I am cutting at R=3.35. I also tried to go up to 4.0 to provide more
>> freedom and to include the SS TM-O at 3.6.
>> It seems that including MS was not fruitful at the moment. I found the
>> contribution very tiny, Importance < 10.
>> I included the path at 3.6, and it fits well, but when I include the Na,
>> the CN_Na goes to high values (>10) and errors (~+/- 50)
>> I also tried to restrict the CN of TM to force the Na to take place and
>> get good results. Also useless.
>> I was checking the data in R_real and the TM and Na paths. I see the TM
>> path is in phase while the Na path is not. I wonder if this is affecting
>> the fit. How should I constrain the fitting to solve this situation?
>> Best regards.
>>
>> [image: image.png]
>>
>>
>>
>> (^ㅇᆽㅇ^)(=˃ᆺ˂=)(=🝦 ༝ 🝦=)
>>
>> Eugenio H. OTAL
>> Assistant Professor
>> Dept. of Materials Chemistry
>> Shinshu University
>> 4-17-1 Wakasato, Nagano 380-8553, JAPAN
>> eugenio_otal at shinshu-u.ac.jp
>> https://sites.google.com/view/zettsu-laboratory/news-updates
>>
>> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>
>> Who is John Galt?
>>
>> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 1:24 AM Robert Gordon <ragordon at alumni.sfu.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Otal,
>>>
>>> I ran a quick FEFF simulation just to see what is present under that
>>> second peak in the FT.
>>> There are many more shells than just TM and Na...e.g.
>>>
>>>
>>> There is significant multiple scattering and another backscattering peak
>>> (Fe-O) at
>>> 3.6Angstroms. All of these are going to spread underneath that peak in
>>> the FT. You might
>>> also be getting some interference from the 4.07A MS stuff. It doesn't
>>> seem a surprise that
>>> just including TM and Na is giving problems.
>>>
>>> What is your high-R cutoff? Have you tried including multiple-scattering
>>> or that 4th backscattering
>>> contribution?
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Robert
>>>
>>> On 2024-01-09 12:06 a.m., Otal Eugenio wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>> Happy New Year!
>>> I am dealing with the fitting of NaMn0.3Fe0.4Ni0.3O2 second shell.
>>> I have Mn, Ni, and Fe at 2.9772Å and Na at 3.1859Å, showing only one
>>> shell. If I use any of the transition metals (dZ <5) for fitting the second
>>> coordination shell. fitting is fine, but when I introduce the Na path, the
>>> fitting has no sense, CN_Na grows and also its error.
>>> Even including Na, I have Nvary = 10 and Ninp = 13.98, so I am getting
>>> out of ideas and nothing helpful in the ifeffit Archive until now.
>>> Is there any strategy for dealing with mixed second coordination shells?
>>> I am attaching the file exported from Larch and the cif file.
>>> Best regards.
>>>
>>>
>>> (^ㅇᆽㅇ^)(=˃ᆺ˂=)(=🝦 ༝ 🝦=)
>>>
>>> Eugenio H. OTAL
>>> Assistant Professor
>>> Dept. of Materials Chemistry
>>> Shinshu University
>>> 4-17-1 Wakasato, Nagano 380-8553, JAPAN
>>> eugenio_otal at shinshu-u.ac.jp
>>> https://sites.google.com/view/zettsu-laboratory/news-updates
>>>
>>> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>>
>>> Who is John Galt?
>>>
>>> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ifeffit mailing listIfeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.govhttp://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
>>> Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ifeffit mailing list
>>> Ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
>>> http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
>>> Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ifeffit mailing list
>> Ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
>> http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
>> Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlo U. Segre (he/him) -- Duchossois Leadership Professor of Physics
> Professor of Materials Science & Engineering
> Director, Center for Synchrotron Radiation Research and Instrumentation
> Illinois Institute of Technology
> Phone: 312.567.3498
> segre at iit.edu   http://phys.iit.edu/~segre   segre at debian.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20240117/9f62b350/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 6m1qwMkGPObtzPU2.png
Type: image/png
Size: 49298 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20240117/9f62b350/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 97278 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20240117/9f62b350/attachment-0005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 142712 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20240117/9f62b350/attachment-0006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 113062 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20240117/9f62b350/attachment-0007.png>