[Ifeffit] determining reasonable fitting parameters

Ravel, Bruce bravel at bnl.gov
Wed Jul 27 22:11:43 CDT 2016


That's my understanding also.
B

--
  Bruce Ravel  ------------------------------------ bravel at bnl.gov

  National Institute of Standards and Technology
  Synchrotron Science Group at NSLS-II
  Building 743, Room 114
  Upton NY, 11973

  Homepage:    http://bruceravel.github.io/home/
  Software:    https://github.com/bruceravel
  Demeter:     http://bruceravel.github.io/demeter/


On July 27, 2016, at 7:01 PM, Scott Calvin <dr.scott.calvin at gmail.com> wrote:

This is also related to whether it is appropriate to apply a McMaster correction to sigma2 after fitting, right? (Or “during,” but since it’s just an offset, it amounts to the same thing.) In Bruce’s method, a McMaster correction is appropriate, although often it’s small in comparison with the reported uncertainties anyway. In Matthew’s method, there is no need for a McMaster correction. Essentially McMaster attempts to correct for using a constant normalization instead of the expected smooth decrease in the normalization factor after the edge. Or am I remembering the meaning of that correction wrong?

—Scott Calvin
Sarah Lawrence College

> On Jul 27, 2016, at 5:26 PM, Matthew Marcus <mamarcus at lbl.gov> wrote:
>
> I think that if the wiggliness in the spline is enough to cause trouble by the mulriplicative effect, then it's probably eating up the wiggles by subtraction, anyway.
> However, I can see that you wouldn't want the bother and potential for trouble involved in having a second curve for the post-edge division.
>        mam
>
> On 7/27/2016 2:08 PM, Bruce Ravel wrote:
>> On 07/27/2016 04:56 PM, Matthew Marcus wrote:
>>> Oh, so it assumes that chi(k) = (mu(E(k))-spline(k))/const.?  Mine does
>>> (mu(E(k))-spline(k))/spline(k), which I guess has its own problems
>>
>> Exactly.  Both solutions have problems.  The potential for trouble with "/const" seems less severe to me and easier to support (in the sense of supporting the use of a software package).  So that's why Athena does what she does.
>>
>> B
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ifeffit mailing list
> Ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
> Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit


_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20160728/6d3af55a/attachment.html>


More information about the Ifeffit mailing list