[Ifeffit] Linear combination fitting
Guvenc Akgul
gakgul at aps.anl.gov
Wed Apr 8 01:13:22 CDT 2009
dear all,
thanks for your help.
guven
----- Original Message -----
From: Dominik Samuelis <d.samuelis at fkf.mpg.de>
Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2009 3:18 pm
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] Linear combination fitting
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit <ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov>
> Dear Guvenc,
>
> Shelly and Scott have already replied to this issue, and I fully agree
>
> with their points. Nevertheless, I'd like to add some points, that
> generally apply to linear component fits.
>
> The huge discrepancy between chi(k) and norm(E) fit very likely is an
>
> indication that your data is not sufficiently described by your
> standards. It might be that you're either using a standard component
>
> that is not present in your system, or that you have not only two, but
>
> three or more components in your system.
>
> There is a number of ways to check which one could be the case. Very
>
> often it helps to fit the system without the restriction that the
> weights of the standards must sum to one. That way, you effectively
> allow for the determination of a residual component during the fit. If
>
> your system is sufficiently described by the standards, the weights of
>
> the standards should sum to a constant value close to unity. The
> difference to unity basically gives the residual.
>
> If you have a non-negligible (or even concentration-dependent)
> residual, PCA might help you to determine how many standard components
>
> actually are required to fit the system. Be aware, though, that the
> interpretation of PCA results is somewhat complicated. If PCA shows
> that you need 4 linearly independent quantities to fully describe your
>
> system, it doesn't necessarily mean that your system has 4 components.
>
> Even temperature differences between scans might manifest as an
> additional "component".
>
> Cheers,
> dominik
>
>
> Quoting Guvenc Akgul <gakgul at aps.anl.gov>:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I have done Ti doped ZnO EXAFS data analysis but I guess it is
> > getting mixture structure at high concentration for example 55% Ti
>
> > doped ZnO.Also I done linear combination fit , but at fitting space
>
> > norm(E),ZnO weight is 0.779 and ZnTiO3 is 0.221 then I changed
> > fitting space is chi(k) ZnO weight is getting 25.2 and ZnTiO3 is
> > getting 74.8 and it is not same like at fitting space norm(E) why?
> >
> > regards
> >
> > guven
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ifeffit mailing list
> > Ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> > http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Dominik Samuelis
> d.samuelis at fkf.mpg.de
> Max-Planck-Institut für Festkörperforschung
> Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
> Heisenbergstr. 1
> 70569 Stuttgart
> Germany
> Phone +49-711-689-1769
> Fax +49-711-689-1722
> Web http://www.fkf.mpg.de/maier/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ifeffit mailing list
> Ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
More information about the Ifeffit
mailing list