[Ifeffit] Comparison of "amp" between Feff8.40 and feff6 - Curved waves or Plane waves?

Ying Zou zou at uwm.edu
Fri Aug 29 12:54:27 CDT 2008

Dear all,

Nice to get so prompt response from Bruce and Scott, thanks for their effort to make this list vital!

Looks like "amp" is a factor which can be reduced. Then there is a question: how would all paths be sorted? by Reff or by "amp"? More techically related another question is then: can FEFFIT and FEFF work seamless together on this? Is there any presumption in FEFFIT (or more explicityly, ARTEMIS/ATHENA) which assumes all the paths have been sorted by descending "amp" down from 100% with ascending REFF? 

The background story behind this: using the same structural model (thanks Bruce!), I tried to fit either use paths from FEFF840 or from FEFF6. The fitting with FEFF6 paths does a quite good job, giving a R_factor~1%, reduced chi square~ 90. Yet the one with FEFF840 paths terminates abnormally because two parameters cannot be determined. 

Attached please find two ARTEMIS project files. And appreciate for comments!


Ying Zou
Research Assoc., Dr. Phys.
Physics Department, UWM

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Ti_PTO200K_feff6.apj
Type: application/x-zip-compressed
Size: 197277 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20080829/64dc8f0a/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Ti_PTO200K_feff8_external.apj
Type: application/x-zip-compressed
Size: 2153281 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/attachments/20080829/64dc8f0a/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the Ifeffit mailing list