Hi Mr/Ms, I am a new learner of XAS and meet a problem like before and hope you can give me some hints. [cid:image001.png@01D6ADDA.9D016B40] [cid:image005.png@01D6ADDA.9D016B40] I have a data set after merged and alignment. But at 11-13 A-1, the amplitude of k is much higher than normal but there seems no weird points at XAS spectrum. I wonder how I could deal with this part? If I shorter kmax and it must lose some important information. Best Wishes, Danting Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows 10
Dear Danting, did you look on the background that is subtracted? I guess it is your background that is doing something weird here. To look at the background tick "Background" in the plot. In the region you mention it should be a smooth line without visible oscillations. Cheers, Edmund On 29.10.20 11:02, Chen, Danting wrote:
Hi Mr/Ms,
I am a new learner of XAS and meet a problem like before and hope you can give me some hints.
I have a data set after merged and alignment. But at 11-13 A-1, the amplitude of k is much higher than normal but there seems no weird points at XAS spectrum. I wonder how I could deal with this part? If I shorter kmax and it must lose some important information.
Best Wishes,
Danting
Sent from Mail https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows 10
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
I agree, this is a sign of a poor background subtraction. I find that this
can be mitigated by cutting back on your spl;ine range for background
subtraction. Change it by 0.5 at a time or less and keep plotting in
k-space. You might have to lose a bit of range but that just means that
the data is not good enough to extend that far.
Carlo
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 9:23 AM Edmund Welter
Dear Danting,
did you look on the background that is subtracted? I guess it is your background that is doing something weird here. To look at the background tick "Background" in the plot. In the region you mention it should be a smooth line without visible oscillations.
Cheers,
Edmund
On 29.10.20 11:02, Chen, Danting wrote:
Hi Mr/Ms,
I am a new learner of XAS and meet a problem like before and hope you can give me some hints.
I have a data set after merged and alignment. But at 11-13 A-1, the amplitude of k is much higher than normal but there seems no weird points at XAS spectrum. I wonder how I could deal with this part? If I shorter kmax and it must lose some important information.
Best Wishes,
Danting
Sent from Mail https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows 10
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing listIfeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.govhttp://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
-- Carlo U. Segre -- Duchossois Leadership Professor of Physics Director, Center for Synchrotron Radiation Research and Instrumentation Illinois Institute of Technology Voice: 312.567.3498 Fax: 312.567.3494 segre@iit.edu http://phys.iit.edu/~segre segre@debian.org
It's possible that your data really has a kink in it. Zoom in on that last bit in E space before any background subtraction and see if there's something odd-looking. If there's really an artifactual kink, then there's not much you can do. mam On 10/29/2020 7:47 AM, Carlo Segre wrote:
I agree, this is a sign of a poor background subtraction. I find that this can be mitigated by cutting back on your spl;ine range for background subtraction. Change it by 0.5 at a time or less and keep plotting in k-space. You might have to lose a bit of range but that just means that the data is not good enough to extend that far.
Carlo
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 9:23 AM Edmund Welter
mailto:edmund.welter@desy.de> wrote: Dear Danting,
did you look on the background that is subtracted? I guess it is your background that is doing something weird here. To look at the background tick "Background" in the plot. In the region you mention it should be a smooth line without visible oscillations.
Cheers,
Edmund
On 29.10.20 11:02, Chen, Danting wrote:
Hi Mr/Ms,
__ __
I am a new learner of XAS and meet a problem like before and hope you can give me some hints.
__ __
__ __
I have a data set after merged and alignment. But at 11-13 A-1, the amplitude of k is much higher than normal but there seems no weird points at XAS spectrum. I wonder how I could deal with this part? If I shorter kmax and it must lose some important information.
__ __
Best Wishes,
Danting
Sent from Mail https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows 10
__ __
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov mailto:Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit Unsubscribe:http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov mailto:Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
-- Carlo U. Segre -- Duchossois Leadership Professor of Physics Director, Center for Synchrotron Radiation Research and Instrumentation Illinois Institute of Technology Voice: 312.567.3498 Fax: 312.567.3494 segre@iit.edu mailto:segre@iit.edu http://phys.iit.edu/~segre segre@debian.org mailto:segre@debian.org
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
participants (4)
-
Carlo Segre
-
Chen, Danting
-
Edmund Welter
-
Matthew Marcus