Hi Joseph, On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:15 PM, joseph washington wrote:

Hi Matt, Thanks for your reply. I actually did not diliberately modify the intermediate FEFF files.

I think you should probably post the input file.

Up to this point, I beleive that I've been following Bruce's example consistently. Its only when I noticed that the path lengths were showing up differently that I started opening feff files.

Which example is that?

Furthermore, it may be that this is just a bug because if I import the "misbehaving" path into the list of paths for fitting in Artemis, it then shows the correct path length there. So wierd - it says it is 5.9211 in feff2019.dat but it says its 5.9179  when you import it for fitting.

Yeah, I agree...that looks like a problem. --Matt