Basic EXAFS question
Hello All, If I have a Ta(1-x)Ge(x)O(y) thin film, with Germanium concentration of a few percent, is it possible in principle to get useable fluorescence-mode EXAFS spectra around the Ge K edge (11.1 keV)? Or is it likely that the spectra would be complicated by additional Ge fluorescence excited by processes triggered by Tantalum L edge absorption (9.88, 11.13, 11.68 keV)? Thanks, Darren
Hi Darren,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Darren Dale
Hello All,
If I have a Ta(1-x)Ge(x)O(y) thin film, with Germanium concentration of a few percent, is it possible in principle to get useable fluorescence-mode EXAFS spectra around the Ge K edge (11.1 keV)? Or is it likely that the spectra would be complicated by additional Ge fluorescence excited by processes triggered by Tantalum L edge absorption (9.88, 11.13, 11.68 keV)?
Thanks, Darren
Ack -- I think the Ta L2 edge (33 eV above Ge K edge) is going to make that very hard. You might be able to isolate Ge Kalpha from the Ta L lines with a crystal analyzer, but the change in penetration depth at the Ta L2 edge is going be huge, unless the film is much much less than an absorption length. --Matt
Hi Darren,
It's probably not doable in a conventional experiment. You're going to have great big tantalum edges right on top of your germanium XANES. And then you've got a forest of tantalum fluorescence lines near your germanium K-alpha lines.
So if your thin film is at all thick compared to an absorption length of tantalum, then the probe depth is going to change sharply across the spectrum, and that will show up in your signal. If it's not that thick, then your germanium signal will be very weak. And in either case, you're going to have a hard time separating out the germanium fluorescence from the tantalum fluorescence, while the latter is varying dramatically in intensity.
--Scott Calvin
Sarah Lawrence College
On Jun 27, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Darren Dale
Hello All,
If I have a Ta(1-x)Ge(x)O(y) thin film, with Germanium concentration of a few percent, is it possible in principle to get useable fluorescence-mode EXAFS spectra around the Ge K edge (11.1 keV)? Or is it likely that the spectra would be complicated by additional Ge fluorescence excited by processes triggered by Tantalum L edge absorption (9.88, 11.13, 11.68 keV)?
Thanks, Darren _______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Darren, You will see the Ge K-edge rising just before the rise of Ta L2 edge. In principle, if you collect good quality data around Ta L2 edge (that is, from ~ 150 eV below and up to 500 eV above (because Ta L3 edge will come up after that)), you may be able to isolate the Ge K-edge peak from Ta L2 pre-edge. But, of course, it will be only the region in the immediate vicinity of Ge 1s-4p transition peak, not post-edge. Still, you may be able to tell between oxidized and reduced Ge based on the peak shape, as they are very different between these two states. I doubt you can do much more than that. And, of course, no EXAFS. For such separation you will need to approximate Ta L2 edge using a combination of arctan and Lorentzian curves (please see the literature for different methods for such fits). You will be lucky if Ta L2 pre-edge is smooth and can be fit analytically (I haven't done it and it will not work if it has any pre-edge peaks). Anatoly ________________________________________ From: ifeffit-bounces@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov [ifeffit-bounces@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov] on behalf of Darren Dale [dsdale24@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 9:48 AM To: ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov Subject: [Ifeffit] Basic EXAFS question Hello All, If I have a Ta(1-x)Ge(x)O(y) thin film, with Germanium concentration of a few percent, is it possible in principle to get useable fluorescence-mode EXAFS spectra around the Ge K edge (11.1 keV)? Or is it likely that the spectra would be complicated by additional Ge fluorescence excited by processes triggered by Tantalum L edge absorption (9.88, 11.13, 11.68 keV)? Thanks, Darren _______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Thank you very much Matt, Scott and Anatoly for giving my question such careful consideration. Darren
participants (5)
-
Anatoly I Frenkel
-
Darren Dale
-
Darren Dale
-
Matt Newville
-
Scott Calvin