Hi Matt, Thanks for your suggestion. I will use this for the analysis of my sample. I have a query that what if I change the Mn by Zn at the Atoms page calculation so that the feff.inp file has already Zn instead of Mn. Is there any difference between the two methods. With thanks Abhijeet On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:30 PM,

wrote:

Send Ifeffit mailing list submissions to ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ifeffit-request@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov

You can reach the person managing the list at ifeffit-owner@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. Analysis of EXAFS data of a Zn sample with the theoretical model of a similar Mn sample (Abhijeet Gaur) 2. Re: Analysis of EXAFS data of a Zn sample with the theoretical model of a similar Mn sample (Matt Newville)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:22:42 +0530 From: Abhijeet Gaur To: ifeffit Subject: [Ifeffit] Analysis of EXAFS data of a Zn sample with the theoretical model of a similar Mn sample Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi all, I am trying to analyse the EXAFS data of Zn sample whose structure is not available. The crystallographic data is available for a Mn sample which is likely to have same coordination environment as Zn sample . Is it possible to use the theoretical model generated for Mn sample for the EXAFS analysis of the Zn sample? How much error is expected in the structural parameters obtained from such fittings?

With thanks in advance

-- Dr. Abhijeet Gaur