Hi Anatoly,
maybe the high voltage of the I0 chamber is off?
All the best,
Kirill
Dr. Kirill A. Lomachenko
Scientist at BM23/ID24 beamlines
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
71 avenue des Martyrs
CS 40220
38043 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
Tel: +33 438 88 19 14
www.esrf.eu
On 15/06/2023 08:09, ifeffit-request@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov wrote:
Send Ifeffit mailing list submissions to
ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ifeffit-request@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
You can reach the person managing the list at
ifeffit-owner@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Brain teaser (Anatoly Frenkel)
2. Re: [Ext] Brain teaser (Jeffrey Terry)
3. Re: [Ext] Brain teaser (matthew marcus)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:30:41 -0400
From: Anatoly Frenkel
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] Brain teaser
Message-ID: <866EACCF-DAD2-4486-AAE0-AC3F6B28023E@stonybrook.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Amazing idea. I thunk you were the only one who succeeded to use third harmonic of Si for taking EXAFS at high atomic number elements. But that does not explain the peaks and dips.
Anatoly
On Jun 15, 2023, at 12:22 AM, matthew marcus wrote:
?Suppose the mono is being used at the 333 reflection (for Si), intentionally working at the 3rd harmonic. In that case, if the fundamental isn't filtered out, you could get just what we see, with the sample doing the filtering before the beam gets to the transmission chamber.
mam
On 6/14/2023 9:16 PM, Anatoly Frenkel wrote:
Thank you, Matthew and Robert, but I think the explanation is more simplle. The fact that there are peaks in I0 and dips in transmission is a clue that explains why transmission is almost linear while I0 curves up.
Anatoly
On Jun 14, 2023, at 11:34 PM, matthew marcus wrote:
?One thing that's pretty odd is that the glitches are peaks in I0, and dips in It. It would be much easier to explain if It was the one that increased steeply and I0 was more linear, but the presence of the edge in It shows that you didn't switch them. Red = It. What's that sudden drop at the end?
Could it be that the I0 chamber is misaligned so that beam is scraping one of the plates? That could cause all sorts of odd things to happen.
mam
On 6/14/2023 5:27 PM, Anatoly Frenkel wrote:
Hello, all. It is a low- to medium- level brain teaser.
Pt-coated collimating mirror was in place for Pd K-edge measurement, but Au L3-edge of Pd-Au alloy was measured (for testing purposes). I0 and It detectors were both Ar filled ionization chambers. Because of the energy dependence of reflectivity of the Pt mirror, I0 intensity was strongly nonlinear (blue curve). However, the transmission intensity in the It detector was almost linear (red curve). Why?
Anatoly
image.png
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:17:35 -0500
From: Jeffrey Terry
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] [Ext] Brain teaser
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Well, I?ll take a shot. Looks like the mirror angle is totally fubared, you are getting Bragg peaks from the coating or substrate that are giving you the peaks in Io. Since you have no idea what angle those are going through Io, they are unlikely to make it into either the sample or It. Since those photons are removed from the beam hitting the sample, they would show up as intensity dips in It. I?d bet that most (all?) of the reflected beam is not going into the sample. I?m kind of surprised It signal is as clean as it is, but then I don?t know the gains on either measurement amplifiers. I couldn?t find a flat mirror angle that would cause the cutoff at 12870? eV but since it is a collimating mirror who knows what range of angles were actually being hit.
Jeff Terry
Interim Chair, Department of Biology
Interim Chair, Department of Social Sciences
Professor of Physics
Professor of Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering
Editor, Applied Surface Science
Illinois Institute of Technology
3101 S. Dearborn St.
Chicago IL 60616
630-252-9708
On Jun 14, 2023, at 7:27 PM, Anatoly Frenkel wrote:
Hello, all. It is a low- to medium- level brain teaser.
Pt-coated collimating mirror was in place for Pd K-edge measurement, but Au L3-edge of Pd-Au alloy was measured (for testing purposes). I0 and It detectors were both Ar filled ionization chambers. Because of the energy dependence of reflectivity of the Pt mirror, I0 intensity was strongly nonlinear (blue curve). However, the transmission intensity in the It detector was almost linear (red curve). Why?
Anatoly
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit