Re: [Ifeffit] Ifeffit Digest, Vol 158, Issue 1
Hi Bruce,
Now this is clear.
In my case the correction I have to perform requires these
measured/evaluated parameters: chi, mu (not sure if it's better to work
with normmu here) and the background function.
Is it physically meaningless to have the mu(k) and bkg(k) data? If that is
not the case I would like to have these two columns exported in the ascii
chi(k) file.
So then I can perform the correction and re-import the new corrected chi(k)
and make comparison with the uncorrected.
Kind regards,
Matteo
2016-04-01 15:06 GMT+02:00
Send Ifeffit mailing list submissions to ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ifeffit-request@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
You can reach the person managing the list at ifeffit-owner@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Chi(E) data export and import (Matteo Busi) 2. Re: Chi(E) data export and import (Bruce Ravel) 3. Re: Question about Io during data collection (Luxton, Todd)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 13:58:23 +0200 From: Matteo Busi
To: ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov Subject: [Ifeffit] Chi(E) data export and import Message-ID: < CAOyEiGhFhPbQ5Xn1is+R4MPVDQ4mxS4wXCcWM-j2qBcO5117-g@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi Bruce, this message il linked to the previous solutions you find for me.
For the reference, I asked to have a column of the chi(E) in the exported mu(E) data. This has worked correctly so far.
Now for my master thesis, I'm performing a correction to chi(E) in the E space regarding to some geometrical properties of the sample. I have also tried to re-import the corrected data as a chi(k), having reproduced the right k grid column, but it looks totally wrong. The thing I'm not sure about is if the chi(E) needs to be fourier trasnformed into chi(k) or not. That's because I would have liked to make comparison in the Athena software between the two chis, but if that's not possible I will keep it to the external software (mathematic) with which the correction is performed. Or if you can share me the fourier transform routine performed I can include it to my correction script.
Hope the message is clear, Kind Regards,
Matteo
Matteo,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Matteo Busi
Hi Bruce, Now this is clear. In my case the correction I have to perform requires these measured/evaluated parameters: chi, mu (not sure if it's better to work with normmu here) and the background function. Is it physically meaningless to have the mu(k) and bkg(k) data? If that is not the case I would like to have these two columns exported in the ascii chi(k) file. So then I can perform the correction and re-import the new corrected chi(k) and make comparison with the uncorrected.
Kind regards, Matteo
It would certainly help (and by that I mean "help you get the answers you're looking for") if you gave us more details about what you're trying to do rather than ask for how to what you think you want to do. Just to be clear: Converting from E to k does not involve a Fourier transform, just k = sqrt((2m*e/hbar**2)*(E-E0)) for k in Ang^-1 and E in eV, that's k ~= sqrt(0.262468*(E-E0)) I'm not sure what you're trying, but I would image you want to use normalized mu(E) or at least pre-edge subtracted mu(E). That is, what we call mu(E) is typically really -ln(I/I0) where I and I0 are not the actual intensities before and after the sample, but counts or counts per time in some detector that samples the flux. These values include more or less arbitrary scale factors (amplifier gains, etc) included. That means that (unless you very careful) mu(E) does not have meaningful units, certainly not cm^-1 or cm^2/gram. Normalized mu(E) doesn't have such units either, but it's an easier place to start. --Matt
participants (2)
-
Matt Newville
-
Matteo Busi