XAFS of poly-metals contaminated soil samples
Dear members of the mailing list: This year we have applied the synchrotron radiation and get the chance to Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility at beamline 1W1B-XAFS. It is the first time to use this equipment to measure our samples. We communicate with the beamline staff for some guideline and help, but they also do not have much experience on soil samples. Would you like give us some suggestions? If you could, can you supply me some resources like sample preparation or others? Now I try to use synchrotron radiation to elucidate some phenomenons of heavy metals in mining area soil. In my soil sample, the Zn is about 498ppm and the Cu is about 562ppm, the first step I focus on Zn but the copper concentration is higher than Cu. Will copper interfere zinc If I use XAFS to measure the Zn? I plan to use fluorescence detection. The Fe in the sample is at high concentrations (85g/kg), from some literature that might be an issue. Would you like to give me some suggestions in the sample preparation and measurement? Table 1. Characterization of the soil (mean ± SD, n = 3)
TOC
g·kg-1
TN g·kg-1
Available phosphorus
mg·kg-1
Available potassium
mg·kg-1
CEC
cmol·kg-1
Trace metals mg·kg-1
Pb
Zn
Cu
Cd
Mine soil
3.69
0.16
0.9
4.1
5.27
1368.2±244.76
497.74±90.27
562.2±94.36
6.48±0.36
*Not detected Thank you very much. Best Regards Xia Bing -- Department of Environmental Engineering, Room D-614, 6/F, Geography and Environmental Sciences Building, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510275 Cellphone: +86 150 1301 6565 Personal Website:http://sweetblues.cn
If you're using an energy-dispersive detector like a solid-state detector, then the Cu will not cause too much of a problem because only the Kb line will interfere, and that's smaller in intensity than the Zn Ka line and will have little EXAFS on it. As for Fe, you can get considerable reduction in background simply by filtering with Al foil. You lose some Zn signal, but it may be that you're limited by the max count rate in the detector, in which case you gain by knocking down the Fe signal. Something you may want to consider is microprobe. With bulk EXAFS, you get an average speciation. If there are several species present, it becomes difficult to make a unique decomposition into species. With microprobe, as Manceau has shown, you can use the spot-to-spot variation to work out what the likely species are because the proportions of species will vary. Some spots may in fact be pure species. Once you've figured out the correct, small subset of the set of Zn standards, you can then do a linear fit to the bulk using only those species identified from the micro. See for instance Manceau, A., Marcus. M. A., Tamura, N. (2002) "Quantitative speciation of heavy metals in soils and sediments by synchrotron X-ray techniques", in Applications of Synchrotron Radiation in Low-Temperature Geochemistry and Environmental Science, P. Fenter and N.C. Sturchio, Eds. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC., 49, 341-428 which is available at the ALS beamline 10.3.2 website http://xraysweb.lbl.gov/uxas/Publicatons/Publications.htm -> Papers. This article is old, but it contains a clear explanation of this micro-macro idea. Another advantage of the micro method is that a large fraction of the metal is often found in 'hotspots' of locally high concentration. Doing EXAFS on these becomes easier than on the bulk. However, such hotspots can be a seductive trap; it's possible for a large fraction of the metal to be in a weak, diffuse background which is easily ignored when picking points for micro-XAS. Thus, it's good to do both micro and bulk. Elemental associations are often useful clues. For example, if Zn is always found associated with Fe, then Zn-sorbed Fe oxides or oxyhydroxides become obvious possibilities. Such reasoning should be used with caution as association does not always imply incorporation. You will want to run at low temperature, especially if you get on to Cu, due to radiation damage. Cu, in particular, is quite susceptable and easily reduces to metal nanoparticles if you're not careful. mam On 9/9/2011 10:23 AM, Xia Bing wrote:
Dear members of the mailing list:
This year we have applied the synchrotron radiation and get the chance to Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility at beamline 1W1B-XAFS. It is the first time to use this equipment to measure our samples. We communicate with the beamline staff for some guideline and help, but they also do not have much experience on soil samples. Would you like give us some suggestions? If you could, can you supply me some resources like sample preparation or others?
Now I try to use synchrotron radiation to elucidate some phenomenons of heavy metals in mining area soil. In my soil sample, the Zn is about 498ppm and the Cu is about 562ppm, the first step I focus on Zn but the copper concentration is higher than Cu. Will copper interfere zinc If I use XAFS to measure the Zn? I plan to use fluorescence detection. The Fe in the sample is at high concentrations (85g/kg), from some literature that might be an issue. Would you like to give me some suggestions in the sample preparation and measurement?
Table 1.
Characterization of the soil (mean ± SD, n = 3)
TOC
g·kg^-1
TNg·kg^-1
Available phosphorus
mg·kg^-1
Available potassium
mg·kg^-1
CEC
cmol·kg^-1
Trace metals mg·kg^-1
Pb
Zn
Cu
Cd
Mine soil
3.69
0.16
0.9
4.1
5.27
1368.2±244.76
497.74±90.27
562.2±94.36
6.48±0.36
*Not detected
Thank you very much.
Best Regards
Xia Bing
-- Department of Environmental Engineering, Room D-614, 6/F, Geography and Environmental Sciences Building, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510275 Cellphone: +86 150 1301 6565 Personal Website:http://sweetblues.cn
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Hi Xia,
--Matt Newville <newville at cars.uchicago.edu> 630-252-0431
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Xia Bing
Dear members of the mailing list: This year we have applied the synchrotron radiation and get the chance to Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility at beamline 1W1B-XAFS. It is the first time to use this equipment to measure our samples. We communicate with the beamline staff for some guideline and help, but they also do not have much experience on soil samples. Would you like give us some suggestions? If you could, can you supply me some resources like sample preparation or others? Now I try to use synchrotron radiation to elucidate some phenomenons of heavy metals in mining area soil. In my soil sample, the Zn is about 498ppm and the Cu is about 562ppm, the first step I focus on Zn but the copper concentration is higher than Cu. Will copper interfere zinc If I use XAFS to measure the Zn?
The Cu will add a background signal to the Zn signal, which might make the measurements take more time, but at these concentrations it should not cause any serious problems.
I plan to use fluorescence detection. The Fe in the sample is at high concentrations (85g/kg), from some literature that might be an issue. Would you like to give me some suggestions in the sample preparation and measurement?
You probably can't extract the Fe from your sample without significantly changing the soil chemistry. Putting aluminum foil (perhaps up to 100 microns) over the detector is a simple but effect approach. The Al will absorb the Fe flourescence at about twice the rate it absorbs the Zn fluorescence. --Matt
Hi Xia - please see my comment below
Xia Bing
Dear members of the mailing list: This year we have applied the synchrotron radiation and get the chance to
Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility at beamline 1W1B-XAFS. It is the first time to use this equipment to measure our samples. We communicate with the beamline staff for some guideline and help, but they also do not have much experience on soil samples. Would you like give us some suggestions? If you could, can you supply me some resources like sample preparation or others?
Now I try to use synchrotron radiation to elucidate some phenomenons of heavy
metals in mining area soil. In my soil sample, the Zn is about 498ppm and the Cu is about 562ppm, the first step I focus on Zn but the copper concentration is higher than Cu. Will copper interfere zinc If I use XAFS to measure the Zn?
I plan to use fluorescence detection. The Fe in the sample is at high
concentrations (85g/kg), from some literature that might be an issue. Would you like to give me some suggestions in the sample preparation and measurement?
*********************************************************************** Just a comment: Be careful with these high concentrations while using fluorescence. Be sure to dilute your samples (e.g. with boron nitride) so you won't have a self absorption problem. Alternatively, you might use transmission mode instead of fluorescence. If you are a beginner (like me), a very good review for practical as well as theoretical issues is "Analysis of soils and minerals using X ray absorption spectroscopy" (Kelly et al. 2008). Good luck, Hana *********************************************************************
Thank you very much.
Best Regards
Xia Bing-- Department of Environmental Engineering,
Room D-614, 6/F,Geography and Environmental Sciences Building,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510275Cellphone: +86 150 1301 6565Personal Website:http://sweetblues.cn
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@... http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
participants (4)
-
Hana
-
Matt Newville
-
Matthew Marcus
-
Xia Bing