Dear All Recently, I got one compound, W/Mo oxide, which has the similar structure with hexagonal WO3. We tested the EXAFS of W L3 edge and Mo K edge of this compound. So, we use the hexagonal WO3 model to refine the structure of our compounds. My question is that how can I get the FEFF file of this compound. Can I directly change some of W to Mo in FEFF file? or Do I need to add the Mo in the atom file? I do appreciate your help. Best wishes Ying
Hi Ying: On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Ying Zhou, Anorganisch-Chemisches Inst. wrote:
Dear All
Recently, I got one compound, W/Mo oxide, which has the similar structure with hexagonal WO3. We tested the EXAFS of W L3 edge and Mo K edge of this compound. So, we use the hexagonal WO3 model to refine the structure of our compounds. My question is that how can I get the FEFF file of this compound. Can I directly change some of W to Mo in FEFF file? or Do I need to add the Mo in the atom file? I do appreciate your help.
There are several ways to do this, depending on what you are trying to find out. If you change W to Mo in the atoms input file than you are really making MoO3. What it seems like you need to do is to generate the FEFF input file from the WO3 structure, then replace the central atom with Mo. This will give you the first path which is likely oxygen. The second longest set of paths are likely to be W/Mo and you can do two things, one is to generate a FEFF calculation with W in this position and then make a second calculation with Mo and use both paths to fit the Mo environment. You will have to be careful about multiplicities though since by starting with the WO3 structure, you are assuming some degeneracies in the paths. The advantage is that you potentially have some multiple scatteing paths available to use. Another approach is to generate the FEFF input file from WO3, look at the near neighbors and then generate some "quick first shell" paths for the nearest neighbor (oxygen) and then two fro the next near neighbor (one with W and one with Mo). The difference here is that you now have uncorrelated paths with no implied degeneracies. You cannot use this to fit multiple scattering paths. I guess that my approach would be to start with the latter, more simple approach first to try to understand the problem. If I see that the environment looks like it is possible to fit with multiple scattering, I would move to the first approach, being careful to realize that in a solid sloution compound, the occupancy of the second shell of metal atoms is probably random and not perfectly ordered like a FEFF input file with substitutions would be. Hope this helps. Carlo -- Carlo U. Segre -- Professor of Physics Associate Dean for Special Projects, Graduate College Illinois Institute of Technology Voice: 312.567.3498 Fax: 312.567.3494 segre@iit.edu http://www.iit.edu/~segre segre@debian.org
participants (2)
-
Carlo Segre
-
Ying Zhou, Anorganisch-Chemisches Inst.