Hi Kefan, you mentioned a .bin file? I couldn't find any file attached to your last email... Before getting down to business, let me tell you that Ge/Si QDs grown by MBE were "EXAFSed" (if such a term exists) in detail by Kolobov & co-authors and it would be interesting to check your data against that published in [Z. H. Sun, S. Q. Wei, A. V. Kolobov, H. Oyanagi, and K. Brunner, Phys. Rev. B 71, 245334 (2005)]. Getting down to the topics: 1- Important point: I assumed your EXAFS experiments were performed at low temperature (~ 10K) to minimize thermal disorder. Is this assumption correct? If you measured at room temperature, then it would explain why you do not see much action above k ~ 10 inverse angstrom, since thermal disorder could be damping your not-so-strong EXAFS signal. I'd suggest you to always measure the QDs at the lowest possible temperature to make the spectra clearer and the post-processing (including fitting) easier. 2- Your concern about GeOx in your samples is well justified. That "deep" in the XANES region, just after the white line, is characteristic of Ge-O bonds and is not present in the bulk forms of Ge (crystalline and amorphous); I'm not sure about bulk SiGe, though. It would not be surprising to have Ge-O in your samples since O is a fast diffuser and your capping layer is just 15 nm. At 500oC or more O atoms can surely get into your QDs. Although O binds preferentially to Si rather than Ge, you may not have enough Si to "grab" all the O. My suggestion is that you should try some XANES linear combination fits using your QDs as unknowns and bulk crystalline Ge, bulk crystalline SixGe1-x and bulk crystalline GeO2 as standards. It is easy to perform such fits using Athena, check the manual again. You can also check Bruce's excellent example available online at: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ravel/software/doc/Athena/html/examples/aucl.html My guess is that your samples contain mixed environments similar to the mentioned standards. You can also try using amorphous standards instead of the crystalline ones. 3- To verify the presence of crystalline Ge and/or Ge-O bonds in your samples, performing XPS or Raman measurements (if available) would be of invaluable help. 4- I think there is no need to truncate the data after 10 inverse angstrom. Just close the k-space window right after the last oscillations (before the "flat" region) and you should be fine. Keep in mind that the number of independent parameters will be small in this case since you will get a k region of ~ 6 inverse angstroms (from 4 to 10 more or less). Good luck, Leandro On Dec 18, 2007 1:35 PM, wrote:

Hi Leandro Thank you for your helpful advices. The title should be change to "Please give me some advices" , and I am sorry for this error.

The attached .prj file can be opened by Athena rightly by changing the download file's extend name .bin to .prj, if someone else want to join our discuss.

Then go to our topics:

The QDs samples were prepared by MBE and XAFS measurements, as you guessed, were performed at a synchrotron facility in fluorescence mode. Since the Si/Ge intermixing happened frequently during growth, there is certainly Si in so-called Ge quantum dots(QDs, or nanocrystal). However, now I am very caring for if the GeOx in the QDs. The XAFS spectra show that there may be GeOx in the Ge QDs, but since the QDs were covered in situ by a 15nm Si cap layer the oxidizing process of QDs by air should not happen. This inconsistency between XAFS and experiments is the real reason for that I want to extract the truth from strict softwae analysis.

1, I have the bulk Ge and diluted SiGe standard spectra, but they do not resemble with these spectra as you mentioned. I am sure that the QDs is a combination of Ge and Si elements, and am not clear if the O exists. The growth temperature is beyond 500oC, and annealing was performed from 550-800oC(all temperature uncalibrated with +/- 50oC ). The amorphous Ge seems to be impossible, but can not exclude it. In situ RHEED also can not tell me if the deposited Ge is crystallizing.

2, If I truncate the k to 10 A-1, the fit result is accepted or not?

Kefan _______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit