On Thursday 15 February 2007 01:31, Ruwan Wijesundera wrote:
We have used Athena and Artemis software to analyses the EXAFS. When we do the analysis, we used different S2o for each path for fitting of Cu2O data. I succeeded to obtain good fitting by this way. Documents related to percent EXAFS analysis have been mentioned S2o is one value for all paths. What I want to know is our fittings are correct or not. I am looking forward early response.
About 10 years ago we had being using another program made by Tokyo University in Japan. In this program, the refined parameters also included S2oj and Nj to the each cells
Questions 8 and 9 on this FAQ page: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/iffwiki/FAQ/FeffitModeling are, I think, relevant to your question. In particular, read the first link under question 9, keeping in mind that it was written 3 and 1/2 years ago and Artemis has changed somewhat since then. B -- Bruce Ravel ---------------------------------------------- bravel@anl.gov Molecular Environmental Science Group, Building 203, Room E-165 MRCAT, Sector 10, Advanced Photon Source, Building 433, Room B007 Argonne National Laboratory phone and voice mail: (1) 630 252 5033 Argonne IL 60439, USA fax: (1) 630 252 9793 My homepage: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ravel EXAFS software: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ravel/software/exafs/