Dan Carter wrote:
Thats great about the R-factor, I was very impressed to see it so low. Reduced Chi-square = 382.556284248 R-factor = 0.015036203 (fit I started with--two e0's: one for 1st path/1 for others)
I'm wasn't positive about how to use the third cumulant. So, I made a variable third to guess in that position for the first path (the nearest neighbor, right). Here are the results: Reduced Chi-square = 415.039996182 R-factor = 0.014768538 third = 0.000045 (Can you tell if this is a better fit from the Reduced
Chi-square)
If I separate ss's for the first path and the others (leaving the
third
parameter) I get this: Reduced Chi-square = 462.878645915 R-factor = 0.014748364 (not much improvement)
One more thing, for the mailing list: How can I find out if it is ok to separate the e0's of the nearest neighbor from the others?
Thanks, Dan