Dear Darek, Sorry for the late response. To fit the "first shell" the No.of independent points and No.of variables which i use are as follows: I use deltaK=11, deltaR = 1.1 so No.of independent points are 8 and No.of variables are 4 (i.e. N, e0, delr, and ss2) I set s02=0.9. Best regards, Rana On 14.06.2010 19:00, ifeffit-request@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov wrote:
Send Ifeffit mailing list submissions to ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ifeffit-request@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
You can reach the person managing the list at ifeffit-owner@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. XAFS fitting with multiple atomic sites of absorbing atom (Jatinkumar Rana) 2. ODP: XAFS fitting with multiple atomic sites of absorbing atom (Zajac, Dariusz A.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:00:27 +0200 From: Jatinkumar Rana
To: Ifeffit users Subject: [Ifeffit] XAFS fitting with multiple atomic sites of absorbing atom Message-ID:<4C15FDBB.1050203@helmholtz-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Dear users,
I have measured XAFS spectra on Mn and Fe edge on my material. The material contains 3 different atomic positions for Mn and 4 different atomic positions for Fe.
Initially, I tried fitting Fe-edge/Mn-edge spectra using indiviual Fe/Mn atomic position one-by-one (i.e. first take one Fe/Mn position, calculate Feff paths, consider certain paths to fit specific R-range, then take another Fe/Mn position and do the same) but the fit was not good visually and in terms of goodness of fit parameters.
Then, i tried fitting Fe-edge/Mn-edge spectra, taking into account all Fe/Mn atomic position together i.e. I separately calulated Feff paths for each Fe/Mn atomic position and summed up related paths from each Feff calculation for fitting a specific R-range. (The assumption being, the experimental Fe-edge/Mn-edge XAFS spectra has varying contribution from all Fe/Mn atomic position in crystal structure).
Anybody in the group could comment about my approach to fit such problem ?
Is there any specific strategy to fit such problem ?
I would be thankful if you could suggest some literature available on such problems.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards, Rana
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:34:18 +0200 From: "Zajac, Dariusz A."
To: "XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit" Subject: [Ifeffit] ODP: XAFS fitting with multiple atomic sites of absorbing atom Message-ID: <35E004AD6290A7438FCA34BBF325F41601206741@ADXV2.win.desy.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Dear Rana, could you specify how many independent data points and variables you have and you use for fitting? thnx darek
-----Wiadomo?? oryginalna----- Od: ifeffit-bounces@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov w imieniu Jatinkumar Rana Wys?ano: Pn 2010-06-14 12:00 Do: Ifeffit users Temat: [Ifeffit] XAFS fitting with multiple atomic sites of absorbing atom
Dear users,
I have measured XAFS spectra on Mn and Fe edge on my material. The material contains 3 different atomic positions for Mn and 4 different atomic positions for Fe.
Initially, I tried fitting Fe-edge/Mn-edge spectra using indiviual Fe/Mn atomic position one-by-one (i.e. first take one Fe/Mn position, calculate Feff paths, consider certain paths to fit specific R-range, then take another Fe/Mn position and do the same) but the fit was not good visually and in terms of goodness of fit parameters.
Then, i tried fitting Fe-edge/Mn-edge spectra, taking into account all Fe/Mn atomic position together i.e. I separately calulated Feff paths for each Fe/Mn atomic position and summed up related paths from each Feff calculation for fitting a specific R-range. (The assumption being, the experimental Fe-edge/Mn-edge XAFS spectra has varying contribution from all Fe/Mn atomic position in crystal structure).
Anybody in the group could comment about my approach to fit such problem ?
Is there any specific strategy to fit such problem ?
I would be thankful if you could suggest some literature available on such problems.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards, Rana _______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
End of Ifeffit Digest, Vol 88, Issue 12 ***************************************