Hi Matt,
Thanks for your suggestion. I will use this for the analysis
of my sample.
I have a query that what if I change the Mn by Zn at the Atoms
page calculation so that the feff.inp file has already Zn instead of Mn.
Is there any difference between the two methods.
With thanks
Abhijeet
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:30 PM, wrote: Send Ifeffit mailing list submissions to
ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ifeffit-request@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov You can reach the person managing the list at
ifeffit-owner@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Analysis of EXAFS data of a Zn sample with the theoretical
model of a similar Mn sample (Abhijeet Gaur)
2. Re: Analysis of EXAFS data of a Zn sample with the
theoretical model of a similar Mn sample (Matt Newville) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:22:42 +0530
From: Abhijeet Gaur Hi all,
I am trying to analyse the EXAFS data of Zn sample whose
structure is not available.
The crystallographic data is available for a Mn sample which is
likely to have same coordination environment as Zn sample .
Is it possible to use the theoretical model generated for Mn
sample for the EXAFS analysis of the Zn sample?
How much error is expected in the structural parameters
obtained from such fittings? With thanks in advance --
Dr. Abhijeet Gaur