Did you check your data against someone else's? Maybe you have hole effect
or overabsorption.
mam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Calvin"
Hi Juan,
You're saying you have that low a value of S02 for a bulk platinum standard? Anatoly's right...you'd better figure out why before you continue. But one piece of advice I have: for a simple crystalline standard like platinum, by all means fit more than one coordination shell (with coordination numbers constrained)! That will be very helpful in diagnosing what is going on, and, for certain cases, might even solve the problem.
Which brings up the first important question to ask...what is the uncertainty on the S02 of 0.53?
--Scott Calvin Sarah Lawrence College
At 02:03 PM 12/4/2006, you wrote:
Hi all,
I read your papers Anatoly. You fixed the value of S02 found in the Pt metal, and the expression in Artemis would be like this: N:1 x S02: amp·N, right?? I have a low value of S02 in the case of platinum (0.53), how can I solve the problem? Bond distances = delR + Reff (with phase correction)?
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit