On Sunday 07 August 2005 21:19, Scott Calvin wrote:
This one is easy to see; even the plain vanilla copper project will do it. Basically, restoring a fit model tends to take subsequent journal entries with it. That is not how a journal should work--if I try five fits and take notes along the way, and then decide to return to the second fit, the notes I've written since the second fit (including, say, the formula for the potion which will allow cats to recite Shakespeare) shouldn't vanish.
I'm normally not much of a cat person, but I want to meet *your* cats. This is a good point. I currently treat the journal as part of the data associated with a fit. As you point out, the journal should be associated with the project as a whole. I'll put fixing this high on the to do list. Thanks, B -- Bruce Ravel ----------------------------------- bravel@anl.gov -or- ravel@phys.washington.edu Environmental Research Division, Bldg 203, Room E165 Argonne National Laboratory phone: (1) 630 252 5033 Argonne IL 60439, USA fax: (1) 630 252 9793 My homepage: http://feff.phys.washington.edu/~ravel EXAFS software: http://feff.phys.washington.edu/~ravel/software/exafs/