Hi Kai,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Sanwald, Kai
Hi,
I would like to fit the NiFe2O4 spinel structure to EXAFS data of mixed Ni/Fe-(hydro)xide films. However, ATOMS cannot deal with structures exhibiting crystal sites with partial occupancies. I know that this problem has been adressed to some extent on the mailing-list already in May 2012 (see http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/2012-May/010544.html) and Bruce Ravel shortly outlined how to edit the .cif file in order to run ATOMS and FEFF6. Attached you find the NiFe2O4.cif file that I like to employ. I tried the following:
1. changed occupancy from 0.5 to 1 in line Ni1 Ni2+ 16 d 0.625 0.625 0.625 . 0.5 0
2. subsequently deleted line
Fe2 Fe3+ 16 d 0.625 0.625 0.625 . 0.5 0
I got rid of the ATOMS warning concerning the partial occupancy but FEFF6 crashes due to atoms being postioned too closely to each other. I am pretty sure that my editing resulted in a change of the structure.
I would be very glad if someone could explain to me in some detail how I need to edit the .cif.
Thank you very much for your help.
Best,
Kai
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
This question comes up quite often. I think you even pointed to the places that have good answers.... Partial occupancy has a reasonably straightforward meaning for crystallography. Well, a simple interpretation of partial occupancy is reasonably straightforward for dealing with simple diffraction data. Partial occupancy is not so straightforward meaning for moderately complex X-ray or neutron scattering, and has no meaning whatsoever for XAFS. Simply put, XAFS does not use concepts such as "site" from crystallography. With Feff and the analysis programs that rely on it, you calculate the XAFS for exactly one selected absorbing atom in exactly one cluster of atoms. Each atom is either there or not. There is no partial occupancy, there is no randomness, and there is no averaging over crystallographic sites, because crystallographic sites are not relevant. You can move atoms around in the cluster, introduce variable occupancy, and average over multiple sites in a cluster by running calculations for many clusters and averaging the XAFS contributions. So, remove the partially occupied site, as these don't make any sense. Generate a cluster that does not have overlapping atoms, these don't make any sense either. If you want, you can then change the properties of the atoms (position and Z) in the cluster and run Feff for a few different clusters and average the results. Hope that helps, --Matt