Hi Kellie,
It's a little hard to tell for sure why your "percap" is going
slightly greater than 1 without knowing more details of the analysis.
Questions like the following come to mind:
Did you include an S02 term?
Is "focc" fixed? If so, could the value be slightly off?
Is sigma2 set or being adjusted -- could this be offf?
I wouldn't expect direct answers to these, just pointing them out as
things to re-check. There are a lot of terms that effect the XAFS
amplitude, and it can be tricky when you're trying to de-couple them.
Cheers,
--Matt
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Kellie Aldi
Hi, I have a question on the use of constraints and restraints in EXAFS data fitting.
I am using SixPack to build a model for the EXAFS of some synthetic layered transition metal (TM) oxides with relatively large amounts of layer vacancies. I am refining the occupancy of the layer TM site, from which I can determine the amount of layer vacancies. I want to include a parameter in this model that refines the number of these vacancies that are capped by interlayer TM (something that can happen in these structures), but I am having difficulty in deciding a responsible way to define the parameters of this variable. I am modifying the intensity of the interlayer TM scattering paths with a parameter
fcap = (1-focc)*percap
where focc is the refined occupancy of the layer TM site, and percap is the percentage of vacancies, "1-focc", that are capped by interlayer TM.
However, just letting percap float, the value goes greater that 1... which, as a percentage, does not make much sense physically in my model. So I want to keep the value of this between 0 and 1. I have tried what was suggested on the IFEFFIT frequently asked questions page regarding constraints and restraints. I don't feel comfortable simply using a constraint and forcing the value to be between 0 and 1 using the suggested min/max idiom.
I like better the idea of penalizing a fit when percap is outside of a defined range and thus "encouraging" the fit to settle percap somewhere inside this range. But in trying to use the restraint idea, including the fix suggested by Matt Newville for only penalizing the fit outside of the min/max range, percap still goes slightly above 1 (about 1.02) and in my results I get a value for the "penalty" that I am unsure how to interpret. Can this value be used to understand why the restraint still allows the value of percap to be outside of the defined "ideal" range?
I am trying to understand how the restraint that Matt Newville defined in the link in the restraints/constraints FAQ works, but I am relatively new to EXAFS modeling and thus shaky on my skills at defining these parameters and knowing how certain math functions can be used. Are there any other help sections or guides that might address the use of such restraints? Or any suggestions on how to re-define this restraint?
I would greatly appreciate any suggestions/input!
Thanks,
Kellie Aldi
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit