On Monday, May 13, 2013 04:19:05 PM Bruce Ravel wrote:
I agree that the fits are being evaluated slightly differently in the old and new versions of the code. As you say, best fit values and statistical parameters are somewhat different. I am not sure I agree that they are "nowhere near similar", but the disrepancy is much larger than a mere numerical difference. I am not yet clear what is going on, but I am looking into it.
More info: the behavior on my linux machine is differnt from Windows. The difference in the fit result is subtle on Linux and quite enormous on Windows. I am not sure which part of that confuses me more. I'll keep looking into it. B -- Bruce Ravel ------------------------------------ bravel@bnl.gov National Institute of Standards and Technology Synchrotron Methods Group at NSLS --- Beamlines U7A, X24A, X23A2 Building 535A Upton NY, 11973 Homepage: http://xafs.org/BruceRavel Software: https://github.com/bruceravel