Hi Prof. Rehr, Matt, Bruce This is in reference to distribution and changes of FEFF as discussed by Prof. Rehr and Matt.... Perhaps Matt you don't appreciate how liberal! Prof. Rehr is in distributing FEFF....A recent experience convinced me that it so! I was curious to check a calculation of Zn doping in LSCO system by performed by DCA [Dynamical Cluster Approximation] code. I contacted one of the authors , Thomas A. Maier, he said it is OK but he has to confirm with Mark Jarell......Then Mark Jarell sent me a list of reservations he has to make the code public, I answered his points, anyways despite my many assurances that it would not be distributed further he weasled out.......... Thus I personally appreciate Prof. Rehr to distribute and decimate the code so that others can benifit....... Plus yours and Bruce many efforts in developing Atoms, Athena, Artemis and Ifeffit................ thanks and regards sher "John J. Rehr" wrote:
Hi Matt,
It's not clear to me that FEFF has to be changed at all to get a tensor XANES calculation going. The code simply has to be rerun a few times with different input. Anyway, The FEFF8.2 license now allows users to make changes that improve input/output.
Also various modules of FEFF are now redistributable in order to facilitate user developments in response to previous suggestions from Matt and Bruce. This seems to be a good way to go, since much of FEFF is an engine that shouldn't be messed with. Also much of FEFF6 is now distributed with IFEFFIT. These EXAFS parts of the code are very stable/reliable. It doesn't seem desirable to me to freely distribute more recent parts that are less well developed. On the other hand we will and do work with various collaborators on various code developments.
I'd like to hear from other users/developers of their concerns about the FEFF license. Funds from the license fee do go to the UWOTT to support the FEFF project (equipment supplies, travel etc.).
John
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, John J. Rehr wrote:
Doing XANES fits ala Benfatto and Della Longa would also be desirable in the long run, i.e., fitting the XAS(x) with x standing for various parameters like interatomic distances. To do that would generally require looping over the FMS module in FEFF and could get time consuming. To avoid this, one needs something like a tensor XANES calculation, which computes d mu/ dx via multiple XAS calculations and hence permits fast linear interpolations. This is not implementable with IFEFFIT/ATHENA at present as far as I know. However, I don't see major difficulties in implementation (?).
Well, it wouldn't be easy, but it is technically feasible. Bruce and I have been pushing for changes to Feff that would facilitate these and other important capabilities for many years now.
The main difficulty is a legal one. The Feff license forbids anyone from altering Feff8 and distributing the changes. So I agree when you say that these changes cannot be implemented within IFEFFIT. This is not for any technical reason, but simply because you do not allow it to happen. You are unwilling to change the code to allow these things, and forbd anyone else from making such changes.
This is not an unfortunate but unavoidable consequence of an otherwise beneficial license. No, it is the entire point of the Feff license to restrict others from developing new capabilities exactly of this sort. There is no other explanation for the license. The scientific merit of this policy is beyond my comprehension, but the restriction is completely deliberate.
Perhaps the more surprising thing is that Feff has never included analytic capabilities, but is widely used for EXAFS analysis. In this respect, Feff is very unusual for scientific software. Since those working on analysis codes are forbidden from changing Feff, it's not very likely that significant progress will be made in XANES analysis or other new areas unless you pay attention to the requests and suggestions of experimentalists and authors of analysis codes. History is does not on your side.
And yet from the above statement, you see these capabilities for XANES analysis as technically possible and desirable. I agree with this, but don't see how they can possibly be done given the very clear intention of the Feff license. I cannot imagine anyone willing and able to make these changes.
Since you think these capabilities for XANES analysis are both desirable and possible, it would be interesting to hear why you think it is in the best interest of the XAFS community for the Feff Project to prevent the development of such capabilities.
--Matt
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
-- %Ins:::::::Prof. Dr. Sher Alam Work:Rm D-625 Photonics, Nat. Inst. of AIST, AIST Tsukuba Central 2, 1-1-1 Umezono Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568 Japan [W]phone:+81-298-61-3478 fax:+81-298-61-3476 email:alam-sher@aist.go.jp