That's my understanding also.
B
--
Bruce Ravel ------------------------------------ bravel@bnl.gov
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Synchrotron Science Group at NSLS-II
Building 743, Room 114
Upton NY, 11973
Homepage: http://bruceravel.github.io/home/
Software: https://github.com/bruceravel
Demeter: http://bruceravel.github.io/demeter/
On July 27, 2016, at 7:01 PM, Scott Calvin
On Jul 27, 2016, at 5:26 PM, Matthew Marcus
wrote: I think that if the wiggliness in the spline is enough to cause trouble by the mulriplicative effect, then it's probably eating up the wiggles by subtraction, anyway. However, I can see that you wouldn't want the bother and potential for trouble involved in having a second curve for the post-edge division. mam
On 7/27/2016 2:08 PM, Bruce Ravel wrote:
On 07/27/2016 04:56 PM, Matthew Marcus wrote:
Oh, so it assumes that chi(k) = (mu(E(k))-spline(k))/const.? Mine does (mu(E(k))-spline(k))/spline(k), which I guess has its own problems
Exactly. Both solutions have problems. The potential for trouble with "/const" seems less severe to me and easier to support (in the sense of supporting the use of a software package). So that's why Athena does what she does.
B
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit