As I have said before, that's a feature, not a bug. http://bruceravel.github.io/demeter/documents/Artemis/extended/fuzzy.html B On 10/17/2018 10:19 AM, woschangqiang@126.com wrote:
Hello, everyone. I recently ran into an issue in using Artemis software.
I used two versions of Artemis (Artemis 0.8.012 and Demeter 0.9.25) to generate the paths from the same input file (FeS2.inp), but there is big difference between the two path results.
e.g. 1, the path4 and path6 generated in Demeter 0.9.25 are not generated in Artemis 0.8.012, though they have a very low applitude.
e.g. 2, the path7 in Demeter 0.9.25 is likely identical to path5 in Artemis 0.8.012 judging from the degenracy, reff, and amplitude, but their scattering name are different: (+)-S1-S2-(+) in Demeter 0.9.25 and (+)-S2-S1-(+) in Artemis 0.8.012. In my opinion, the scattring sequence of photoelectron in multiple scattering affect the paramters of paths. Why do these two paths have different scattering sequence? Thanks very much for your help. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qiang Chang Institute of Coal Chemistry, CAS Leyuan South II Street 1, Yanqi Development Zone Huairou District, Beijing, POB. 101407 P.R. China Email: w mailto:zhangchh@sxicc.ac.cnoschangqiang@163.com mailto:oschangqiang@163.com
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
-- Bruce Ravel ------------------------------------ bravel@bnl.gov National Institute of Standards and Technology Synchrotron Science Group at NSLS-II Lead Beamline Scientist, 06BM (BMM) Building 743, Room 114 Upton NY, 11973 Homepage: http://bruceravel.github.io/home/ Beamline: https://www.bnl.gov/ps/beamlines/beamline.php?r=6-BM Software: https://github.com/bruceravel Demeter: http://bruceravel.github.io/demeter/