It makes sense. An easy check would be to compare EXAFS of samples 13 and 14.
If 13 was taken at lower temperature than 14 it will be shown by higher EXAFS oscillation intensity
Anatoly
-----Original Message-----
From: ifeffit-bounces@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
Dear All,
I am comparing some simulated EXAFS signals to the file fb.013 from the Farrel-Lytle database. I would be hugely grateful if someone with more knowledge of this data could comfirm the meaning of the line -
# FE83 B17 HT=400C, AT NT
In particular I need to know the sample temp but to my untrained eye the line is ambiguous (I am hoping it is 673K...)
The whole header is below for reference but it's only temp I need.
Many thanks in advance,
Andy
# CUEDGE START STOP BEG FSCTS: 168620. 230500. 174080. 272000. 30. # DELTA: 2000. 15. 90. 150. 210. # DELEND: 217740. 214450. 200860. 187700. 174080. # SEC: 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. # FE83 B17 HT=400C, AT NT
-- Carlo U. Segre -- Professor of Physics Associate Dean for Special Projects, Graduate College Illinois Institute of Technology Voice: 312.567.3498 Fax: 312.567.3494 segre@iit.edu http://www.iit.edu/~segre segre@debian.org _______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit