Pre and post edges are fine, and the model I'm using is made from the
crystallographic data collected. I wouldn't have thought getting a decent
fit with good data is difficult with the crystal structure as the model.
But I'm assuming there is not any kind of reason amp can be above 1. Problem
is, if I restrain it to be between 0 and 1 it sits at 1 with an error of +/-
40.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Calvin"
Hi Paul,
The most likely possibilities are:
1) The normalization (in Athena or whatever) is way off. Make sure you check it by eye and see that the pre-edge or post-edge line isn't crazy for some reason.
2) The model isn't right...your samples are not what you think they are.
So no, I don't think you have a legitimate fit at this point.
--Scott Calvin Sarah Lawrence College
At 08:11 PM 2/26/2006, you wrote:
Uncertainty can get fairly close to 0 (+/- 0.1) but amp gets up anywhere from 2 to 4 depending on what data set I'm fitting to.
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit