Dear Fiona,
I think it would be pretty unusual for transmission and fluorescence
data measured at the same time to be of comparable quality and both be
"noisy-but-good-enough" that merging would actually help. Are you
sure that the data a similar enough (no pinhole or self-absorption
effects) that it really helps to merge the different data sets?
Perhaps posting example data would be a good idea.
--Matt
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:13 PM,
Dear XAFS community members, I have a question concerning data merge. We normally collect XAFS data in both transmission mode and fluorescence mode. We normally have to merge a few scans to enhance signal-to-noise ratio. For one particular sample, I want to know if it is legitimate to merge its transmission scans with its fluorescence scans to improve data quality? I appreciate any input. Regards. Fiona Kizewski North Carolina State University Department of Chemistry
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit