[Ifeffit] Ifeffit Digest, Vol 167, Issue 2
Bruce Ravel
bravel at bnl.gov
Tue Jan 3 14:45:37 CST 2017
On 01/03/2017 03:32 PM, Raj kumar wrote:
> From XRD, it is confirmed that there is no side phase formation and
> contamination. Hence, i guess the heavier element role could be avoided
> here.
Raj,
While this might be true for your sample, in general, a statement like
this always concerns me.
From XRD, you can say is that there is no /crystalline/ side phase
formation and that there is no contamination in the /diffracting/
/portion/ of the sample.
It is very common when preparing nanoparticulate matter for there to be
non- or poorly-diffracting content in the sample. If that content
contains the absorbing element, then it will have an impact on the XAS data.
B
--
Bruce Ravel ------------------------------------ bravel at bnl.gov
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Synchrotron Science Group at NSLS-II
Building 743, Room 114
Upton NY, 11973
Homepage: http://bruceravel.github.io/home/
Software: https://github.com/bruceravel
Demeter: http://bruceravel.github.io/demeter/
More information about the Ifeffit
mailing list