[Ifeffit] Silent Oxygen
ragordon at alumni.sfu.ca
Tue Apr 18 20:10:46 CDT 2017
Further to Bruce's note, I looked at your file. Your model splits the
nearest oxygens by only 0.01A.
Is that the magnitude of splitting you anticipate?
Are you familiar with the resolution criteria for EXAFS?
(k-range [deltak]) * (R-resolution [deltaR]) ~ pi/2 for identical near
This is also discussed in the archives, e.g.:
Looking at your chi(k), it seems usable, charitably, up to about 8 A-1,
not to 12 A-1 as your
window suggests you have used. Claims of being able to resolve small
with this data will be viewed with skepticism.
On 4/18/2017 11:34 AM, Bruce Ravel wrote:
> On 04/18/2017 11:10 AM, Fuxiang Zhang wrote:
>> Hi, all,
>> I am in studying the EXAFS of perovskite and clearly see the split of
>> the first peak after ion irradiation. It should come from a symmetry
>> change, so I use a tetragonal model (instead the original cubic) which
>> contains two independent O sites. However, after running Atoms and
>> Feff, all paths are contributed by only one O atom and nothing related
>> to another Oxygen atoms (see attached file). As a result it may
>> be difficult to get a good fit of the first split Ta-O peaks. I am not
>> sure if it is true or something wrong.
>> Thank you very much
> A fairly common question here on the mailing list. This is a
> *feature* of Artemis, not a bug.
> If you want to /model/ a split in distance, you can drag that path
> into the path list twice and adjust the delta R and amplitude
> parameters accordingly.
More information about the Ifeffit