[Ifeffit] FEFF report: Hard tests failed in fovrg.

[Bruce Ravel]

On 08/07/2013 03:27 PM, Kevin Jorissen wrote:
> The needed improvements are exactly those changes made in later
> versions.  That is why I am more drawn to a FEFF9L than to fitting some
> of the improvements into the old FEFF6L, but I will discuss it with the
> other developers.

My vast preference is to see Feff9L happen rather than to back port
things to Feff6L.  Can't imagine anyone would disagree with that.

B


-- 
  Bruce Ravel  ------------------------------------ bravel at bnl.gov

  National Institute of Standards and Technology
  Synchrotron Science Group at NSLS --- Beamlines U7A, X24A, X23A2
  Building 535A
  Upton NY, 11973

  Homepage:    http://xafs.org/BruceRavel
  Software:    https://github.com/bruceravel