[Ifeffit] Help with cif file
Bruce Ravel
bravel at bnl.gov
Wed Aug 18 09:05:41 CDT 2010
Dominik's answer sounds right to me. See question 15 at
http://cars9.uchicago.edu/ifeffit/FAQ/FeffitModeling
B
On Wednesday, August 18, 2010 02:36:03 am Dominik Samuelis wrote:
> Dear Kleper,
>
> even though I haven't tested it in detail, I'm sure the errors come from
> the fact that ATOMS cannot handle site occupancies other than unity. If
> you have a look in the cif file, you can see that both W (0.23) and Ti
> (0.54) have a fractional occupancy:
>
> loop_
> _atom_site_label
> _atom_site_type_symbol
> _atom_site_symmetry_multiplicity
> _atom_site_Wyckoff_symbol
> _atom_site_fract_x
> _atom_site_fract_y
> _atom_site_fract_z
> _atom_site_occupancy
> _atom_site_attached_hydrogens
> _atom_site_calc_flag
> W1 W4+ 4 e 0. 0. 0.0564(2) 0.23 0 d
> Ti1 Ti4+ 2 a 0. 0. 0. 0.54 0 d
> O1 O2- 4 f 0.3007(6) 0.3007(6) 0. 1. 0 d
>
> To get it working, you need to use the prototypical structure (e.g. TiO2)
> without mixed sites as ATOMS input. In the feff.inp file, you can then
> change 46 out of 100 Ti atoms to W (5 out of 10 should be ok as well for a
> smaller cluster). Don't forget to add the appropriate POTENTIALS line for
> W to the feff.inp. The small shift of the W atoms away from the Ti
> positions then could be handled by some additional delR parameter for the
> W paths during fitting.
>
> All the best,
> Dominik
>
> Am 17.08.2010 um 15:27 schrieb Kleper Rocha:
> > Please,
> >
> > Could someone help me with the cif file attached, get from the
> > www.crystallographic.net shearch with the terms Ti, W, O. When I try to
> > run the Feff the following message appears.
> >
> > "Feff 6L.02
> >
> > WARNING: TWO ATOMS VERY CLOSE TOGETHER. CHECK INPUT.
> >
> > atoms 1 2
> >
> > 1 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> > 2 0.00000 0.00000 -0.16378
> >
> > Run continues...
> > WARNING: TWO ATOMS VERY CLOSE TOGETHER. CHECK INPUT.
> >
> > atoms 1 3
> >
> > 1 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> > 3 0.00000 0.00000 -0.32756
> >
> > Run continues...
> > WARNING: TWO ATOMS VERY CLOSE TOGETHER. CHECK INPUT.
> >
> > atoms 2 3
> >
> > 2 0.00000 0.00000 -0.16378
> > 3 0.00000 0.00000 -0.32756
> >
> > Run continues...
> > WARNING: TWO ATOMS VERY CLOSE TOGETHER. CHECK INPUT.
> >
> > atoms 10 11
> >
> > 10 0.00000 0.00000 2.57634
> > 11 0.00000 0.00000 2.74012
> >
> > Run continues...
> > WARNING: TWO ATOMS VERY CLOSE TOGETHER. CHECK INPUT.
> >
> > atoms 10 12
> >
> > 10 0.00000 0.00000 2.57634
> > 12 0.00000 0.00000 2.90390
> >
> > Run continues...
> > WARNING: TWO ATOMS VERY CLOSE TOGETHER. CHECK INPUT.
> >
> > atoms 11 12
> >
> > 11 0.00000 0.00000 2.74012
> > 12 0.00000 0.00000 2.90390
> >
> > Run continues...
> > WARNING: TWO ATOMS VERY CLOSE TOGETHER. CHECK INPUT.
> >
> > atoms 13 14
> >
> > 13 0.00000 0.00000 -2.90390
> > 14 0.00000 0.00000 -3.06768
> >
> > Run continues...
> >
> > Titanium tungsten oxide (0.54/0.46/2)
> > Ti.54 W.46 O2
> > O2 Ti0.54 W0.46
> > Peters, E.
> > Ueber ein niedervalentes Titan-Wolframoxid: Ti0,54 W0,46 O2
> > Calculating potentials and phases...
> >
> > free atom potential and density for atom type 0
> > free atom potential and density for atom type 1
> > free atom potential and density for atom type 2
> > free atom potential and density for atom type 3
> > overlapped potential and density for unique potential 0
> > overlapped potential and density for unique potential 1
> > overlapped potential and density for unique potential 2
> > overlapped potential and density for unique potential 3
> > muffin tin radii and interstitial parameters
> >
> > This warning indicates a problem in the Atoms list. For some
> > reason you have atoms that are separated by than 0.93 Angstroms
> > (or 1.75 Rydberg).
> >
> > This may be due to the presence of hydrogen atoms in your feff.inp
> > file, in which case this is an innocuous warning and may be ignored.
> >
> > However, this may indicate a problem constructing the Atoms
> > list. The most common cause of this problem is a mistake in the
> > crystallographic data used on the Atoms page. You may have
> > incorrect values for lattice constants or angles or incorrect
> > values for site coordinates. You may need a shift vector to move
> > the lattice into its standard setting.
> >
> > Please be aware that Atoms works with 5 digits of precision.
> > Thus, if you have a site with a coordinate of 1/3, you should use
> > either "1/3" or "0.33333" on the Atoms page. Using insufficient
> > precision, say "0.333" is a common cause of this error message.
> >
> > Artemis has continued on the possibility that the warning is
> > caused by hydrogen atoms, but be warned that the feff.inp may
> > require your attention."
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kleper de Oliveira Rocha
> >
> > <O2 Ti0.54 W0.46.cif>_______________________________________________
> > Ifeffit mailing list
> > Ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> > http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
--
Bruce Ravel ------------------------------------ bravel at bnl.gov
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Synchrotron Methods Group at NSLS --- Beamlines U7A, X24A, X23A2
Building 535A
Upton NY, 11973
My homepage: http://xafs.org/BruceRavel
EXAFS software: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ravel/software/exafs/
More information about the Ifeffit
mailing list