[Ifeffit] Odd feff result
Bruce Ravel
bravel at anl.gov
Fri Mar 24 17:35:37 CST 2006
On Friday 24 March 2006 13:01, Scott Calvin wrote:
> So here's the question. These three paths are identical except for
> the identity of one of the scattering atoms. The degeneracy of the
> path with boron and the path with nickel is the same. Why is the feff
> amplitude ratio for the boron-containing path higher than that of the
> nickel-containing path? Shouldn't nickel scatter more strongly? And
> yes, I double-checked...the potentials are defined correctly in the
> feff.inp file.
Scott,
I am inclined to side with Jeremy and Feng. One might be surprised by how
quick-n-dirty the amplitude calculation is. If memory serves (and who knows
how likely *that* is), feff computes the complex chi(k) using plane waves,
which is a very quick calculation. It then adds up the magnitude of the
complex chi(k) at 4 points. That's it. The amplitude is never meant to be
more than a guide to eye. As you well know, to know how each path
contributes to the data, you actually need to plot them or -- better -- do a
fit.
B
--
Bruce Ravel ---------------------------------------------- bravel at anl.gov
Molecular Environmental Science Group, Building 203, Room E-165
MRCAT, Sector 10, Advanced Photon Source, Building 433, Room B007
Argonne National Laboratory phone and voice mail: (1) 630 252 5033
Argonne IL 60439, USA fax: (1) 630 252 9793
My homepage: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ravel
EXAFS software: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ravel/software/
More information about the Ifeffit
mailing list