OOPS! Re: [Ifeffit] Re: I should be able to find this somewhere...
Matthew
MAMarcus at lbl.gov
Tue Jan 17 15:01:20 CST 2006
Sorry about that! I meant to send this to Matt alone and didn't see the
Reply-To.
mam
----- Original Message -----
From: "matthew marcus" <MAMarcus at lbl.gov>
To: "XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit" <ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] Re: I should be able to find this somewhere...
> Here's the one I sent to Bruce. It's a fit of hematite. Look at fit11,
which is the best of the bunch. The later
> fits represent lots of screwing around I did. It seems that some projects
show this problem and others don't. I
> wonder if it may be because the data didn't come from Athena, but was
interpolated from my programs.
> mam
>
> Matt Newville wrote:
> >
> > Hi Matthew,
> >
> > > I tried that. The fit I'm thinking of is pretty good. Subtraction by
eye disagrees
> > > grossly with what I see. I suspect it's another one of those
Windows-and-Linux
> > > things.
> >
> > Hmm, not sure. A simple fit I've been working on in Windows and Mac
> > OS does look like it's showing the residual correctly (and
> > consistently on both systems).
> >
> > Can you send an example project?
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --Matt
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ifeffit mailing list
> > Ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> > http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> _______________________________________________
> Ifeffit mailing list
> Ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
>
More information about the Ifeffit
mailing list