[Ifeffit] CN and bond distances in Artemis

[Anatoly Frenkel]

Hi Matthew,

It should be very easy to send to him Pt foil data, especially because,
based on my and others' tests, Pt data collected at different beamlines are
"identical" and thus transferable, but what if the beamline settings
(detuning, slit size, gases, etc.) were not optimized for his experiment? To
make sure everything is tuned up correctly, he should take his own Pt foil
data and compare with theory other other people standards (good idea!).
Alternatively, he will have to operate under assumption that everything was
tuned up correctly and his NP data are perfect, but why to take chances?

Anatoly


-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Marcus [mailto:mamarcus at lbl.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 1:54 PM
To: anatoly.frenkel at yu.edu; XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] CN and bond distances in Artemis


I imagine somebody has done so and would be willing to provide that data.
Unfortunately, the Newville database doesn't have it,
and I don't think I do.  Anatoly, surely you must have done Pt foil?  Yes, I
know it's best to measure everything on the same
beamline, but it's
not essential.
    mam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anatoly Frenkel" <frenkel at bnl.gov>
To: "XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit" <ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:37 AM
Subject: RE: [Ifeffit] CN and bond distances in Artemis


>I would remeasure Pt foil in transmission, by all means.
>
> Anatoly
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ifeffit-bounces at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> [mailto:ifeffit-bounces at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov]On Behalf Of Juan
> Antonio Macia Agullo
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 1:32 PM
> To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
> Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] CN and bond distances in Artemis
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I did fits with self absorption corrected data (Fluo and Booth algorithms)
> and the
> value for S02 is 1.20 (0.30). It seems that I am not very lucky, if I take
> an
> average value (1.20 and 0.50), it should be ok (0.85) jeje, I am joking.
>
> Then...what can I do now?
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Best regards,
> JA
>
> P.S. If I do not answer until Monday do not hate me, I will be on
holidays.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ifeffit mailing list
> Ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
>