[Ifeffit] CN and bond distances in Artemis
Carlo Segre
segre at iit.edu
Tue Dec 5 09:03:31 CST 2006
Hi Juan Antonio:
It looks like this is fluorescence data. It is likely that you have
significant self-absorption if this is a Pt foil. Try to apply an
"infinite" sample correction to this data before fitting. That should
correct the SO2 somewhat. A much better thing to do is to take this data
in transmission. i suspect that if it is a standard foil, it is optimized
for transmission and should be measured in that mode.
Carlo
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Juan Antonio Maciá Agulló wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I did a multiple shell fit for platinum foil and the results were similar: S02 =
> 0.51 and the uncertainty varies from 0.02 to 0.03 depending on the fit. Please
> find enclosed a file with values of energy, I0 and I of the platinum foil. I
> include this file if someone has curiosity on raw data and has time, otherwise
> forget it. Maybe I can suppose a value of 0.85 for S02 and follow with the
> analysis of the data, then...CN equation proposed in the first e-mail is ok?
>
> Thank you very much
>
> Best regards,
> JA
>
--
Carlo U. Segre -- Professor of Physics
Associate Dean for Special Projects, Graduate College
Illinois Institute of Technology
Voice: 312.567.3498 Fax: 312.567.3494
segre at iit.edu http://www.iit.edu/~segre segre at debian.org
More information about the Ifeffit
mailing list