[Ifeffit] CN and bond distances in Artemis

Carlo Segre segre at iit.edu
Tue Dec 5 09:03:31 CST 2006



Hi Juan Antonio:

It looks like this is fluorescence data.  It is likely that you have 
significant self-absorption if this is a Pt foil.  Try to apply an 
"infinite" sample correction to this data before fitting.  That should 
correct the SO2 somewhat.  A much better thing to do is to take this data 
in transmission.  i suspect that if it is a standard foil, it is optimized 
for transmission and should be measured in that mode.

Carlo

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Juan Antonio Maciá Agulló wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> I did a multiple shell fit for platinum foil and the results were similar: S02 =
> 0.51 and the uncertainty varies from 0.02 to 0.03 depending on the fit. Please
> find enclosed a file with values of energy, I0 and I of the platinum foil. I
> include this file if someone has curiosity on raw data and has time, otherwise
> forget it. Maybe I can suppose a value of 0.85 for S02 and follow with the
> analysis of the data, then...CN equation proposed in the first e-mail is ok?
>
> Thank you very much
>
> Best regards,
> JA
>

-- 
Carlo U. Segre -- Professor of Physics
Associate Dean for Special Projects, Graduate College
Illinois Institute of Technology
Voice: 312.567.3498            Fax: 312.567.3494
segre at iit.edu    http://www.iit.edu/~segre    segre at debian.org


More information about the Ifeffit mailing list