[Ifeffit] CN and bond distances in Artemis

Matthew MAMarcus at lbl.gov
Mon Dec 4 13:48:13 CST 2006


Did you check your data against someone else's?  Maybe you have hole effect
or overabsorption.
    mam
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Calvin" <SCalvin at slc.edu>
To: "XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit" <ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov>
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] CN and bond distances in Artemis


> Hi Juan,
>
> You're saying you have that low a value of S02
> for a bulk platinum standard? Anatoly's
> right...you'd better figure out why before you
> continue. But one piece of advice I have: for a
> simple crystalline standard like platinum, by all
> means fit more than one coordination shell (with
> coordination numbers constrained)! That will be
> very helpful in diagnosing what is going on, and,
> for certain cases, might even solve the problem.
>
> Which brings up the first important question to
> ask...what is the uncertainty on the S02 of 0.53?
>
> --Scott Calvin
> Sarah Lawrence College
>
> At 02:03 PM 12/4/2006, you wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I read your papers Anatoly. You fixed the value of S02 found in the Pt
> >metal, and the expression in Artemis would be like this: N:1 x S02:
> >amp·N, right??
> >I have a low value of S02 in the case of platinum (0.53), how can I
> >solve the problem?
> >Bond distances = delR + Reff (with phase correction)?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ifeffit mailing list
> Ifeffit at millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
>




More information about the Ifeffit mailing list