[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Atoms

Gilles asked:


 GH> Does it mean that the 244 version I'm using is not valid too ?

It's not invalid, per se.  But it is old, unsupported, and not under
development; and it contains known bugs.

 GH> BTW, one little thing I came across using a text editor is to use
 GH> two different potentials for an element on different
 GH> crsytallographic sites. Is that automatic in 2.5 ?

No, in that regard 2.5 is the same as 2.44.  But a choice of three
different schemes for assigning unique potentials *is* a feature of
3.0, which is new, supported, and under-development.  (Sadly, it also
contains known bugs, but that's life in the software development
biz. ;-)

B


-- 
 Bruce Ravel  ----------------------------------- ravel@phys.washington.edu
 Code 6134, Building 3, Room 222
 Naval Research Laboratory                          phone: (1) 202 767 5947
 Washington DC 20375, USA                             fax: (1) 202 767 1697

 NRL Synchrotron Radiation Consortium (NRL-SRC)
 Beamlines X11a, X11b, X23b, X24c, U4b
 National Synchrotron Light Source
 Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973

 My homepage:    http://feff.phys.washington.edu/~ravel 
 EXAFS software: http://feff.phys.washington.edu/~ravel/software/exafs/