Hi Lisa,

Just to second Matthew's suggestion, Si(111) should work fine for Ca K edge.     In my experience,  using high angle makes it much more challenging to keep a stable beam -- roll errors become more important, and thermal load can also be worse (power density on 1st crystal, heating from scattering on the second).

So, in that sense, and if it's an option,  Si(111)  (at ~30 degrees) seems preferable to Ge(220) (at ~50 degrees, I believe).
 

Hello.

No, the resolution is fine. I can do XANES fine with InSb111. We use those for years.
Just had problems with EXAFS because for this long range the flux has to be more stable
from the crystals.

Lisa
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit