Hi Bhoopesh and Scott,
I should have given a description of my project. Yes Scott, the work is to investigate the binding mechanisms of aqueous cadmium onto sodium titanate nanotubes. Spectrum of Sample 1 and 2 obtained from merging 9 scans and 4 scans, respectively.
A quick check in Athena and, indeed, the white line of Samples are higher than CdO. I'm not sure the reason behind it though. It is likely that cadmium binds to the surface of substrate rather than inside the bulk. The lack of distinct peaks after 1.8 Å means that there are not many scatters around the absorber?
Bhoopesh, as requested, I have attached the real part of FT (http://img585.imageshack.us/i/ftreal.jpg/). I haven't got a chance to interpret them.
From preliminary fitting of Sample 1, the major and minor peaks at 1.8 and 2.3 Å could be described by a Cd-O path (CdO). This interests me because Sample 2 does not have a peak at 2.3 Å, meaning there is another single scattering path for Sample 2?.
The peaks at 3 Å were fitted with Cd-Ti path (CdTiO3). No multiple scattering paths used. The best fit goes something like this:
****************************************************************************
Independent points = 13.166992187
Number of variables = 8.000000000
Chi-square = 1534.709946959
Reduced Chi-square = 297.021921317
R-factor = 0.000128095
Measurement uncertainty (k) = 0.000060423
Measurement uncertainty (R) = 0.004455442
Number of data sets = 1.000000000
Guess parameters +/- uncertainties (initial guess):
amp = 0.9242390 +/- 0.0509920 (1.0000)
enot = 1.3950420 +/- 0.5425380 (0.0000)
delr = -0.0872060 +/- 0.0051060 (0.0000)
ss = 0.0113250 +/- 0.0008480 (0.0030)
amp_2 = 0.2441320 +/- 0.1905250 (1.0000)
enot_2 = 22.5261260 +/- 4.5990590 (0.0000)
delr_2 = 0.2510860 +/- 0.0719080 (0.0000)
ss_2 = 0.0274690 +/- 0.0128040 (0.0030)
Correlations between variables:
amp_2 and ss_2 --> 0.9342
enot_2 and delr_2 --> 0.9133
amp and ss --> 0.8865
enot and delr --> 0.8632
amp_2 and delr_2 --> 0.3040
delr_2 and ss_2 --> 0.2888
All other correlations are below 0.25
k-range = 2.000 - 9.000
dk = 1.000
k-window = hanning
k-weight = 3
R-range = 1.000 - 4.000
dR = 0.000
R-window = hanning
fitting space = R
background function = none
phase correction = none
R-factor for this data set = 0.00270
***********************************************************************************
The above enot_2 is on the high side. I am not entirely familiar with the parameters yet. Are there other parameters I should worry about?
Cheers,
Alan J. DU
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore