Hi Riti,
A couple of caveats to Matt's answer:
The EXAFS equation is not simply a sum of sine functions. I can
think of two ways that the resolution criteria
can be worked around:
1. Consider the case of two close near neighbours in a
single-crystal environment whose close distances are
geometrically distinct such that, if one were to conduct
polarisation-dependent measurements, one
could turn off one of the distances in one orientation (and perhaps
the other in another), one could fit the
two sets to extract the two close distances. (i.e. you aren't trying
to resolve the two distances in one measurement)
2. If there is a pronounced chemical difference between the
neighbours, they can be resolved even if the
distance separation is small, provided the k-space range being used
provides enough independent parameters
to conduct the fit.
If you wish to convince yourself that these two caveats work, I
suggest creating a model using the AuCu
structure. If you contract or expand the c-axis, and substitute
either Cu for Au (i.e. make Cu but in lower symmetry)
or substitute a different atom on one of the Cu sites, you can test
both Matt's explanation and my caveats above.
cheers,
Robert
On 1/31/2016 6:33 PM, Matt Newville
wrote:
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit