On Monday 08 March 2010 01:24:17 am Pralay K Santra wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> After the final fitting in Artemis, we get the (i) total error; (ii) the
> final value of the parameters; (iii) the error in the parameters as well
> as (iv) the dependencies among the parameters. What is kind of logic used
> in Artemis to calculate these values? Is it Genetic optimization procedure
> used in this process? Can anyone help me by giving some references.
>
> I was going through the old posts and found two posts. One is this one:
> http://cars9.uchicago.edu/ifeffit/FAQ/FeffitModeling and the other one
> mentioned in the same.
>
> I am sorry to ask for some help which is not directly related to the XAFS.
I am not really clear how a question about error analysis could be
considered as not directly related to XAFS. To my mind, error
analysis is at the foundation of any scientific activity.
Ifeffit uses a Levenberg-Marquardt steepest descent algorithm to find
the parameters values which minimize chi-squared, which is computed in
the standard fashion (Bevington's Data Reduction and Error Analysis
for the Physical Sciences is my favorite text on the subject).
The uncertainties are the diagonal elements of the covarience matrix,
albeit scaled by the square root of reduced chi-square. The reason
for this is that it is somewhere between extraordinarily difficult and
impossible to fully evaluate the measurement uncertainty in an XAFS
experiment. As a result, chi-square is scaled incorectly. By
rescaling the diagonal elements of the covarience matrix, we are
assuming that every fit is a good fit and that the only problem is the
evaluation of uncertainties. Thus, if a fit is -- by some criterion --
good and is the one that you want to publish, the error bars reported
by Ifeffit are 1-sigma error bars.
The correlations are taken from the off-diagonal elements of the
covarience matrix. Those need not be scaled and aren't.
The formulas for chi-square, reduced chi-square, and the R-factor are
given on pages 16 and following of this postscript file
http://cars.uchicago.edu/~newville/feffit/feffit.ps
My own take, for what it's worth, on all of this is explained on pages
6 to 15 of this presentation:
http://xafs.org/Workshops/APS2009?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=Ravel_advanced_topics.pdf
B
PS: Phys. Rev. B 70, 104102 (2004) and J. Synchrotron Rad. (2005). 12,
70-74 are interesting papers about Bayesian approaches to EXAFS
analysis. Ifeffit does not do Bayesian analysis. But you seem
interested, so I thought I would point them out.
--
Bruce Ravel ------------------------------------ bravel@bnl.gov
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Synchrotron Methods Group at NSLS --- Beamlines U7A, X24A, X23A2
Building 535A
Upton NY, 11973
My homepage: http://xafs.org/BruceRavel
EXAFS software: http://cars9.uchicago.edu/~ravel/software/exafs/
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit