Richard Mayes wrote:
Chris,
 
You'll answer this question when you post a project file; but since you mention the pre-edge feature, have you reset the Eo to approx. halfway up the absorption edge instead of on the pre-edge feature itself?
 
-Richard

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Carlo Segre <segre@iit.edu> wrote:

Hi Chris:

If you could attach an Athena project file, it would help us to answer
your question.

Carlo

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Chris Patridge wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> After calibration, alignment and merging V K edge data, there seems to
> be a large peak in R space below 1 A.  From most examples and readings,
> this would seem to be noise since atoms do not reside that close to each
> other.  Adding a background addresses this noise but then the number of
> variables becomes too large and meaningless to the first shell R space
> range.  I believe the problem lies with the large pre edge feature seen
> with high valence state Vanadium compounds.  Any suggestions on how to
> work through this and make realistic EXAFS analysis on these compounds.
>
> Thanks everyone,
>
>

--
Carlo U. Segre -- Professor of Physics
Associate Dean for Graduate Admissions, Graduate College
Illinois Institute of Technology
Voice: 312.567.3498            Fax: 312.567.3494
segre@iit.edu   http://www.iit.edu/~segre   segre@debian.org
_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit


_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
I did set the E0 past the edge feature approximately halfway up and then set that E0 to all before merging.  I included a merge project file of V compound.  Thank you.

--
Christopher J. Patridge
Graduate Student
SUNY Buffalo - Dept of Chemistry
716-645-6800 x 2110
315-529-0501