I agree to your point.

AS of now I am not attempting to fit the Ca substituted system for two reasons

1.I am specifically looking for the "cause" for the structure in the second peak. The structure

is present in the calculated CdO Chi(R) plot itself.

2. Apart from that when I tried to put in Ca in the ATOM, Ca is not at all appearing in the list

after running ATOM.

Can you help me out in this matter as well.

Thanking you

---- Varadarajan Sridharan

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:30 PM, <ifeffit-request@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov> wrote:

Send Ifeffit mailing list submissions to
ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ifeffit-request@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov

You can reach the person managing the list at
ifeffit-owner@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. Re: Clarification needed on the structured 2nn peak
(Matt Newville)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 07:52:16 -0500
From: Matt Newville <newville@cars.uchicago.edu>
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit <ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] Clarification needed on the structured 2nn peak
Message-ID:
<AANLkTinjUxHwVBBkCBiONWnNNptLnpSKpI9mnri3HbBv@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Dear Varadarian,

I didn't look at your attachments, but have you considered that there
might be some Cd-Ca in the second shell? I didn't see what value of
x you had in Cd(1-x)CaxO, but if the oxides form a solid solution one
might naively expect the second shell to have (1-x) Cd and x Ca
coordination. Ca and Cd scatter photoelectrons differently enough
to be distinguishable in the EXAFS. It might be that there is extra
disorder too, say if the typical Cd-Ca distance was different from the
typical Cd-Cd distance.

Cheers,

--Matt

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Varadarajan Sridharan
<varadu.sridh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings to all
>
> ?? I am a beginner to EXAFS.
>
> ? Recently I had carried out Cd K-edge EXAFS? measurements on Cd1-xCaxO
> solid solution. The end members CdO and CaO belong to same crystal structure
> Fm-3m.
>
> ?? I had analysed the spectrum with Atthena and fitted with Arthemis. I am
> attaching the Athena project file (***.prj) and that of Arthemis project
> file (***.apr) for your reference.
>
> Athena:
>
> ?? As per the crystal structure of CdO, the first nearest neighbour is at
> 2.345 A corresponding to Cd-O1 inter atomic distance and 2nn distance is
> 3.3.16 A corresponding to Cd-Cd1 inter atomic distance. Though I am able get
> the first peak in chi(R) plot at expected position, I am having some
> problems for the second peak. The second peak has features; main one and a
> shoulder. The main peak itself appears at lower R compared to expected one.
> Intensity of the shoulder increases with Ca substitution at the expense of
> main peak itself.
>
> ??????????? Can any one comment on this?
>
> ???? My predicament: If I associate, based on the structure of second peak,
> bimodal distribution for the Cd-Cd1 interatomic distance, the difference of
> 0.4 A is 11%. This value gives me an uneasy feeling. Is it possible to
> accommodate this difference within the setting of F m-3m?
>
> ????????????????????????????????? OR
>
> ???????????????????????????????? It is due the multi scattering is the
> problem?
>
> Arthemis:
>
> For CdO: ?The k^3 weighted chi fitting, I agree is far from satisfaction.
> Std of delR is a bothering point. I had included 20 paths. Even for the CdO
> with F m-3m, the calculated second peak has a shoulder at lower R. I could
> see a small contribution from path 4. But I am not sure if that is all.
>
> How to float the individual GDS parameter for each and every path? What can
> be done to improve the fitting?
>
> Thanking you all in advance
>
> Varadarajan Sridharan
>
> ----------------------------------
>
> Condensed matter Physics Division
>
> Materials Science division
>
> Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
>
> Kalpakkam 603 102
>
> India
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ifeffit mailing list
> Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
> http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
>
>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit

End of Ifeffit Digest, Vol 89, Issue 3
**************************************