>
> Now it seems  working well except some minor things, I can remove the points
> from the data, the random point selection by software  works better for
> rebinned data. I think the only problem I have now is I still cannot move
> the cursor after double click (I can only remove the points which the
> software decides - at least now it choose the points where I double click).
> When i move my mouse cursor on the plot, it shows the correct coordinates.

I'm still a bit confused about whether this actually working for you.
 The data you sent has fairly large arrays (>2400 points), but all the
data was well-ordered in energy... I think that should "just work",
without needing re-binning.  And it does for me, and I don't see how
re-binning would affect this.

I think it's always been the case that you double-click near the point
to be removed, and hope that Athena does select the one you intended.

> I have one clarifications, when u choose the option to deglitch the data
> (rebinned or non rebinned data), does the x(E) data plot looks like in the
> attached file (line) or it looks like sets of blue round points same size as
> cursor.

For me, it looks very much like the image you attached.   I do not see
a series of dots.

> I think, the issue is solved except that I cannot move the randomly chosen
> point.

Why can't you remove the point chosen?  That seems like it's not
working to me. Wasn't that the problem you were having?

Again, it may be that I'm not understanding. Cheers,

--Matt


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 08:30:39 -0500
From: Bruce Ravel <bravel@bnl.gov>
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit <ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] Handling time resolved data
Message-ID: <52AF007F.4050600@bnl.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 12/13/2013 09:00 AM, Ditty Dixon wrote:
> Dear Bruce,
>
> Recenetly we  did some time resolved measurements, QEXAFS mode. While
> the old Athena arranged the file as we want i.e file 1, 2, 3 etc, the
> new did it bit different 1, 11 12  and again 2, 21 etc. Screenshot
> attached. Why is it doing diffrently for the two version? Can it be
> fixed some how.

You haven't explained exactly where these data come from, so I am
assuming that each scan was written to its own file and these files were
imported into Athena.

In Athena, data are imported in "ascii-betical" order, that is, sorted
in order of characters in the ASCII chart:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII#ASCII_printable_characters

In that sense, Athena sorted your data as expected.  As Chris pointed
out, if you want things like

    nr_1.spec
    nr_2.spec
    ...
    nr_10.spec

to sort numerically by the number between the _ and the .spec, you need
to format the them so that numerical and ascii-ordered sorting come out
the same.  This is done as

    nr_01.spec
    nr_02.spec
    ...
    nr_10.spec

For a quick exafs experiment, two digits is probably not enough, so
you'd want something like

    nr_00001.spec
    nr_00002.spec
    ...
    nr_00010.spec


I don't recall quite how the sorting worked in the old version of Athena
(it has been over 5 years since I stopped working on it), but my vague
memory is that, on Windows, they were imported in the order that they
were clicked upon the file selection dialog.  The way it is currently
done is much better in that it is reproducible.





--
  Bruce Ravel  ------------------------------------ bravel@bnl.gov

  National Institute of Standards and Technology
  Synchrotron Science Group at NSLS --- Beamlines U7A, X24A, X23A2
  Building 535A
  Upton NY, 11973

  Homepage:    http://xafs.org/BruceRavel
  Software:    https://github.com/bruceravel


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit


End of Ifeffit Digest, Vol 130, Issue 22
****************************************